What is the weakest strategy?

Kirjoittanut brianwl, 22.06.2017 at 07:16

This poll needs to be redone as strats have changed since it started. (LB should not be second on the list anymore ♥)

SM GC and IF are too high up.
NC and LB too.

In fact, RA is good for low funds.
Also, when does GW become more useful than SM...

Lucky bastard is the single worst strat in this game very shit because expensive units and crit does nothing

Kirjoittanut RaulPB, 12.06.2017 at 13:51

Kirjoittanut Dyper, 12.06.2017 at 13:06

sure and thats why you have done 1563 games (48% leave so ) = 2313 games
and for stealths units are best stealth master (my optinions)

Leaves are counted as played games too I think

GW duel?

well look on mine stats ...i dont prefer duels :] (in duels are mostly good blitz ... when its a big map) not a GW

and you play only duels looks like ...so please ...shut up and be fair ...."hero" ....

And well i tests some maps/scenarios ...alone and i always leave on the end ....cuz the prewiew does not work ... and the game count all in stats :thumbdown: ...shit :D so iam so "happy" now (care guys ) if you like a nice stats ..especially when you do well

And well ;D i still dont know principle of this game (how it works) but sometime :what: ...one solider stop big army in a city ..with whom you planned to attack (thats so stupid principle ) and look anyway i have nice stats (win rating) Without consciousness (because iam not a woman...and i play like a man ! [human...not a chicken ] )

And I thought I used to much emoji's....

If I could use them 2x ... You would then see what is "too much"

How about Guerilla Warfare?

no such a thing as weakest strategy wtf is this each has its use except for RA

Kirjoittanut SyrianDevil, 03.02.2018 at 14:35

no such a thing as weakest strategy wtf is this each has its use except for RA

So then RA is the weakest...

LOL LB #2 weakest strat

I am done

Slow rolling

Hybrid warfare and Sky menace should not be on the list (9 worst out of 15 overall strategies), they should be in the group of 6 best strats.. They are ranked low but still my point stands!

Kirjoittanut SyrianDevil, 03.02.2018 at 14:35

no such a thing as weakest strategy wtf is this each has its use except for RA

truth

What is up with the dancing babies

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

It's great for world games with lots of cash. Not so good in small maps with little funding.

What about blitzkrieg it does not do any damage all it does is give u more range
Duh

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

How good is Imperialist?

Not insurrection

Kirjoittanut TOTALOFZER0, 05.01.2019 at 04:00

How good is Imperialist?

With Low Funds probably the best because INF IMP Spam when no one can do full reinf is quite OP. But Both GW and IMP are Low funds Strat.

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 26.12.2018 at 23:10

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

Why dont you play someone like me, lets see how good you are then.

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 19.02.2019 at 00:35

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 26.12.2018 at 23:10

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

Why dont you play someone like me, lets see how good you are then.

Why don't you take a flying shit?

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 20.02.2019 at 22:46

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 19.02.2019 at 00:35

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 26.12.2018 at 23:10

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

Why dont you play someone like me, lets see how good you are then.

Why don't you take a flying shit?

It's hard to stand back and let someone say MOS is a good strategy.

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 20.02.2019 at 22:52

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 20.02.2019 at 22:46

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 19.02.2019 at 00:35

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 26.12.2018 at 23:10

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

Why dont you play someone like me, lets see how good you are then.

Why don't you take a flying shit?

It's hard to stand back and let someone say MOS is a good strategy.

I'm sorry, but I've been in too many arguments with self-righteous assholes in these forums on the subject. Ask Taz Youlkepoye and several others from his coalition (Apocalypse, gladiator66, etc.). Ask Homo Erectus, Prince_MurDerer, or Don. All of these players, and others, I have won against using MoS and/or NC. I compete against "real" players in "real" games (rarely scenarios and never RPs), and I have a respectable success rate.

Come on over to the casual side. I'll PM you when I start any new public games.

In fact, there are casual tournaments. I also won a game in the Risk Tournament (no strats or upgrades in that one), and I'm signed up for the 2v2 that I'm hosting with Taz. Join that, if there's still room. Games 7 through 12 in the Risk Tournament have not started yet (Game 6 finished country selection).

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 20.02.2019 at 23:09

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 20.02.2019 at 22:52

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 20.02.2019 at 22:46

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 19.02.2019 at 00:35

Kirjoittanut RatWar, 26.12.2018 at 23:10

Kirjoittanut Nightfeather12, 13.12.2018 at 08:50

How good is master of stealth in peoples opinion?

Unless funds are really low, it can work, regardless of map size. I use it very often, with more wins than losses, because it seems to make sense to me. It works for me. That and NC. Love me some NC!

I've tried every strat many times, except Blitz. Some work for me better than others. It depends alot on how you play and how your style develops. Some people are very aggressive, and that's how they see things - so they tend to go for Blitz or RA or SM - something with long range and enhanced attack - and do very well. My strength is logistics with a bend toward defense. MoS and NC require serious logistics to work well, and Infantry are not nerfed, so those two turned out to be a natural fit for me.

Why dont you play someone like me, lets see how good you are then.

Why don't you take a flying shit?

It's hard to stand back and let someone say MOS is a good strategy.

I'm sorry, but I've been in too many arguments with self-righteous assholes in these forums on the subject. Ask Taz Youlkepoye and several others from his coalition (Apocalypse, gladiator66, etc.). Ask Homo Erectus, Prince_MurDerer, or Don. All of these players, and others, I have won against using MoS and/or NC. I compete against "real" players in "real" games (rarely scenarios and never RPs), and I have a respectable success rate.

Come on over to the casual side. I'll PM you when I start any new public games.

In fact, there are casual tournaments. I also won a game in the Risk Tournament (no strats or upgrades in that one), and I'm signed up for the 2v2 that I'm hosting with Taz. Join that, if there's still room. Games 7 through 12 in the Risk Tournament have not started yet (Game 6 finished country selection).

duel 1v1 casual game, you vs me, now.

I'll bite, though you probably know the duel maps better than I do.

Bueno

Always depends on map and units... not only on strategy... (some strategy can be weak on one map, but strong on another or at idk... btw hell/o (iam back) idk for how long

so pick strategy when you do not know map and units is very risky... and you can not try that without private game for one because prewiew will not show you units (thats why i have wasted 2 games when i come back after years lol... because i pick the worstest trategy for these maps... and then none can join (when you leave...thats also very stupid D so i wasted 2 games/scenarios

Nice game but maintenance and progress is very sihty (simply limited game where shouldnt be