PD question

Kirjoittanut Question, 20.05.2012 at 12:57

And im talking about tank generals vs PD (since tank generals simply choose not to attack your infantry stacks). What are you talking about?

Also how is a PD player supposed to kill huge stacks of militia? Attacking it with infantry is sucide because you pay 60 gold for a infantry with 4 attack while your opponent is paying 30 gold for a militia with 4 defence. He can just park a huge stack outside your capital and force you to spend tons of gold fortifying it.

Well, if you send a general (You need general: infantry attack), your infantries has 5 attack.
And why would someone make so many militia..? Militia has no range and it costs more reinforcements.
If you're using PD, you shouldn't attack big stacks of militia anyway.

Kirjoittanut Gking19, 16.05.2012 at 18:23

I never spam infantry. >.>
Infantry is for defense, tanks offense.

infantry is for defence, large quantities of infantry for offence not tanks. Only use tanks when you need them to help your expansion but really there isn't much use for them.

Tanks are useful if you know your next attack will fail if you use all infantry, which is rarely the case.

With PD you should only use Infantry, also with attacking. Just for this reason:

2 Infantry ($100) - Attack: 8, ARB: 3
1 Tank ($120) - Attack: 7, ARB: 2

The only reason to prefer tanks over infantry in PD, is when you have much money, low reinforcements and want a quick expansion.