Feature: No more changes

That's right. The game, as is, has a simple, clean, elegance. Perhaps the only thing it needs is more purchasable updates - but that should be it.

Kirjoittanut TP_MLD, 08.12.2010 at 08:23

That's right. The game, as is, has a simple, clean, elegance. Perhaps the only thing it needs is more purchasable updates - but that should be it.

I don't believe the game has reached perfection just yet There's still a lot of room for improvement.

Kirjoittanut Ivan, 08.12.2010 at 09:00

Kirjoittanut TP_MLD, 08.12.2010 at 08:23

That's right. The game, as is, has a simple, clean, elegance. Perhaps the only thing it needs is more purchasable updates - but that should be it.

I don't believe the game has reached perfection just yet There's still a lot of room for improvement.

Improvements - yes. Embellishments that take away the clean simplicity (and speed!) - no.

I agree do not go making 500 different unit types keep it simple and streamlined. Maybe some balance and more upgrades are all that is needed.

Air units could use a more direct counter (AA guns or something) and Air units also need a counter to other Air units. (Fighter jets that cant attack land units but are super effective agianst other air units maybe?)

Thats all I can think of that would still keep a really good balance.

I would be happy if there were more types of tanks/units ,

- attacktanks like the Leopard 2, with a high attack-dmg and a medium defence and a short range, but bad vs rocketsoldiers
- "huntertanks" against normal/sheep infantrie but useless against attacktanks and aircraft
- "minesdroper" tanks how could block a smal region , but without any use in battles
- rocketsoldiers for a better tankdefence, but useless against marienes and normal infantrie
- or a aircraftcarrier, with 15 or 10 bombers inside


after all my wishes are more tacticaly opinions.

It might be intresting to have certain units at disavantage to other types but then that makes it more complicated.