Northern Macedonia

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Yeah we are all uneducated.... Can you enlighten us?

Kirjoittanut Cyan Spectre, 25.06.2018 at 15:05

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Yeah we are all uneducated.... Can you enlighten us?

Tell me what you support and why. Please use solid arguements and trustworthy sources otherwise I won't bother answering.

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 15:41

Kirjoittanut Cyan Spectre, 25.06.2018 at 15:05

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Yeah we are all uneducated.... Can you enlighten us?

Tell me what you support and why. Please use solid arguements and trustworthy sources otherwise I won't bother answering.

You can see the whole thread, and you will understand what i support. My points is, a Slavia Macedonia would be the best solution. You? What you support and why? You wont biother answering? So your job is just sitting and judging? You call us all uneducated, but you are the only one without a public opinion.

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Thank you for enlightening us

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

Kirjoittanut avatar, 26.06.2018 at 17:51

Kirjoittanut Cold Case, 25.06.2018 at 14:34

This thread is cancer and filled with uneducated people

>implying you will join JEU

Kirjoittanut Black Swans, 27.06.2018 at 17:20

>implying you will join JEU

Better not, they don't have any capacity of withstand the weight of EU structures and obligations + We'd have to fund them heavily for development, which means less money for other, more productive and useful areas..

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 27.06.2018 at 19:03

Better not, they don't have any capacity of withstand the weight of EU structures and obligations + We'd have to fund them heavily for development, which means less money for other, more productive and useful areas..

Partially true: EU obligations and regulations are outright communistic (not any different than in USSR). Entrepreneurs and capitalists are definitely struggled to death(read:bankrupcy).

But when EU 'fund' eastern europe, they fund mainly roads, so they can transport goods from west to east and make profit, nothing else. Thins havent changed since colonial times, its still predatory imperialism, just softer form.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 27.06.2018 at 19:15

Partially true: EU obligations and regulations are outright communistic (not any different than in USSR). Entrepreneurs and capitalists are definitely struggled to death(read:bankrupcy).

It's not even that, it's just that they're too advanced and hardcore for some States to endure, adapt and progress, hence why Greece failed badly and had to lie about her debt to get in back in 1981 and why Southern Europe countries tend to fall behind. The EU's main fault is being too padronized, that is all, and they wanna padronize it even more, hence Brexit.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 27.06.2018 at 19:15

But when EU 'fund' eastern europe, they fund mainly roads, so they can transport goods from west to east and make profit, nothing else. Thins havent changed since colonial times, its still predatory imperialism, just softer form.

If it was mainly for roads then it wouldn't be a problem, the problem is that another country means one more (infimous) taxpayer and another mouth to feed in an already shortening EU Budget due to Brexit. This means there will be less money in general to cover for the Common Agricultural Policy (the PAC) and all other Common European Funds that vary from Agriculture, to Industry, to Tourism, Electricity, Internet down to Transportation and Conservation (with agriculture definitely being crucial).

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 27.06.2018 at 19:22

If it was mainly for roads then it wouldn't be a problem, the problem is that another country means one more (infimous) taxpayer and another mouth to feed in an already shortening EU Budget due to Brexit. This means there will be less money in general to cover for the Common Agricultural Policy (the PAC) and all other Common European Funds that vary from Agriculture, to Industry, to Tourism, Electricity, Internet down to Transportation and Conservation (with agriculture definitely being crucial).

Ah, that's why winery is destroyed in Hungary, fruit prices plummeted in Poland and French farmers selling villages so cheap, even Easterner wouldn't make a profit of that. Because EU funds them, gotcha.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 27.06.2018 at 19:37

Ah, that's why winery is destroyed in Hungary, fruit prices plummeted in Poland and French farmers selling villages so cheap, even Easterner wouldn't make a profit of that. Because EU funds them, gotcha.

Yeah pretty much, it's ridiculous to do that, market supremacy degenerates into degeneracy, might aswell give it to the poor or export it to poorer countries or what not, we had to destroy almost all of our Fishing Fleet back in the 1990's cuz of the EU and we condemned hundreds of families to poverty

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 28.06.2018 at 01:10

And you ?

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 27.06.2018 at 19:03

Kirjoittanut Black Swans, 27.06.2018 at 17:20

>implying you will join JEU

Better not, they don't have any capacity of withstand the weight of EU structures and obligations + We'd have to fund them heavily for development, which means less money for other, more productive and useful areas..

You talk like Portugal is a fucking economy power

Kirjoittanut avatar, 28.06.2018 at 14:29

You talk like Portugal is a fucking economy power

It's not, but it's certainly more economically viable than Macedonia in some areas lmao

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 28.06.2018 at 15:43

Kirjoittanut avatar, 28.06.2018 at 14:29

You talk like Portugal is a fucking economy power

It's not, but it's certainly more economically viable than Macedonia in some areas lmao

he didnt compare it to macedonia

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 27.06.2018 at 19:03

Kirjoittanut Black Swans, 27.06.2018 at 17:20

>implying you will join JEU

Better not, they don't have any capacity of withstand the weight of EU structures and obligations + We'd have to fund them heavily for development, which means less money for other, more productive and useful areas..

you are talking, portuguese, lel

Kirjoittanut avatar, 28.06.2018 at 14:29

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 27.06.2018 at 19:03

Kirjoittanut Black Swans, 27.06.2018 at 17:20

>implying you will join JEU

Better not, they don't have any capacity of withstand the weight of EU structures and obligations + We'd have to fund them heavily for development, which means less money for other, more productive and useful areas..

You talk like Portugal is a fucking economy power

superiority complex

Kirjoittanut Black Swans, 29.06.2018 at 10:06

superiority complex

Except I'm not, I'm simply stating the obvious, me talking about another weak reality does not mean I'm overpowering my country, stop being falacious

Well this aged like wine

Kirjoittanut avatar, 19.06.2018 at 06:46

Modern greeks =turk+slavic

avatar truly is the smallest brain in atwar LMFAO