No comment

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 22.10.2015 at 14:51

lol. USA is the world's superpower with a corrupt and greedy leadership, no shit sherlock. That is not a secret and you are not a revolutionary. When you stop the cri we can continue our conversation. As i said, proven by your words and pictures, USA wants to weaken and contain Russia. That is what superpowers do. If you didnt want in, you shouldnt have enganged in a pissmatch when USSR was strong. You cant back out now, just because you lost the Cold war. And its not like Russia is a saint. Russia bullied all its neighbours, did their fair share of polanding raping and killing, installing puppet states, meddling into other countries affairs and spying and so on. If it could destroy USA it would. But time just proved USA was more competent and lucky and overshadowed you. Just accept it.


p.s. Btw i support Russia in Ukraine conflict and in Syria, mainly because i wish for a balance of powers. I guess i am not an American drone after all, right? And as for the economic sanctions, Europeans dont really want them, but Washington strongarmed our weakling politicians into doing their bid, so the euro falls and the dollar doesnt collapse. What can you do, as i said its the superpower..

1) Russian Federation is not USSR and therefore couldn't 'lose' in the Cold War because it didn't exist in that time to compete in the first place.

2) I can post a comment with 10,000 words explaining that USSR didn't participate in the Cold War and that 'Cold War' was American imaginery war to scare people so they don't discuss or debate about Communism and so American could justify using military around the globe PROLONGING wars that could be over sooner like Korean War and Vietnam War where people wanted to unite but could not because of the America. USSR was closed country which didn't want to participate in international community and only wanted peace and to mind its own business while America was working on Operation Condor.

3) Since USSR didn't participate in the so called 'Cold War' it couldn't lose it. Gorbachev agreed to reduce military and dismantle Warsaw Pact as a sign of good will to show West that USSR is not 'evil empire' as Reagan said. Gorbachev did everything he promised but Reagan and America didn't fullfill their part of obligation which was just NOT to enter Eastern Europe and border USSR. They took ex-WP into NATO and EU thus again making border with USSR. USSR died 2 years after US-USSR agreement of dismantling WP and reducing Soviet Army.

4) There was no other option against Poland, if Russia didn't occupy it Poland would continue to attack Russia through centuries. Beside, Russia was not selfish - Prussia and Austria took 2/3 of Poland while Russia took 1/3. That mean European great powers dismantled aggressive Poland to bring peace to Europe - and that peace lasted for 100 years until WW1. For that 100 years Poles didn't had to die for their nationalistic leaders and could finally build jobs and families.

5) I have no evidence that Russia ever installed puppet regimes somewhere. If USSR did that, that's another thing since Russia is not USSR but different political entity.

6) America is competing with everyone, not only with USSR or Russia. Maybe they have low self-esteem or confidence in themselves, i don't know. But one thing is for sure and that is Russia or USSR didn't compete with other countries but with its own history. Which is more healthy. USSR competed with Russian Empire, in providing population better life and standard of living. Like electrification of towns and villages, creating farms and factories to produce food and goods for people, for creating stronger army with modern weaponry to protect above-mentioned population, for investing in education, schools and science to discover and innovate new technologies which will boost quality of life and achieve some things like going into space, explore oceans and arctic. Today, Russian Federation compete with history as well, and compare achievemnts, standard of living goes up, crime goes down, technology is being developed, economy is growing, which is victory. No need to show how you are better than some other country and insult them for their 'backwardness' and their way of life.

7) I'll still be against you if you support Russian intervention in Syria for wrong reasons.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 23.10.2015 at 12:56

7) I'll still be against you if you support Russian intervention in Syria for wrong reasons.

this is a reply i just got in one of my comments about US and Russia airstrikes in Syria, in another site.






You call me anti-Russian in atwar, americans call me anti-American in other sites. Its just the cost of telling the truth. Just the cost of dealing with bias, ignorance and blind nationalism. Im used to it. I ll go with the truth everytime, thanks.

So far I read only speculations, and personal opinions in this thread, surprised? Not really. Providing facts in this kind of thread is pointless, even if I provide you sources that could refute what you wrote, you'd still continue to talk nonsense anyway. You're stuck with your opinions.This is what you think? Fine. But spreading lies and hate speech, and subjective opinion on a country and its people, and also saying to nuke the entire region, shows what kind of a person you are.
Also Tito stop turning almost every thread into another discussion about Russia or something that involves it. It's tiresome, don't you get bored from it?

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 24.10.2015 at 04:36

Wow, must be true, he said it! Same like Syrian human rights watch is based in London and operated by one man who never went to Syria. Or Bellingcat 'reporting' it is Russian fault for MH17 crash and West use it as 'legitime source' while infact it is one man who never left his mother's house and doesn't have education so how would he know if Russia is guilty for MH17.

Keep using internet comments as legitimate source of truth.

Kirjoittanut Abraham, 24.10.2015 at 04:53

Also Tito stop turning almost every thread into another discussion about Russia or something that involve it. It's tiresome, don't you get bored of it?

I didn't turn it, you lie. I used example i know of to compare with this topic and show how similar things happen worldwide, which mean this issue is not original or unique. It is their problem replying enthusiastically with anti-russian propaganda because their brains are being raped by the west.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 25.10.2015 at 08:46

Wow, must be true, he said it! Same like Syrian human rights watch is based in London and operated by one man who never went to Syria. Or Bellingcat 'reporting' it is Russian fault for MH17 crash and West use it as 'legitime source' while infact it is one man who never left his mother's house and doesn't have education so how would he know if Russia is guilty for MH17.

Keep using internet comments as legitimate source of truth.

Completely missed the point? Want me to translate my post in Serbian ( when you learn Russian let me know) so you can understand the point i wanted to convey? It wasnt that hard to get you know.