Admins dont change strats before listening to the community!

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.06.2015 at 14:23

if ra tanks have no quantity advantage pd will beat him.

-_________________________________________-

And all this time i'm saying its so easy to spam 50 tanks with Bulgaria in 1v1, higher then 10k funds are basically "of course i will pick RA", 5k is also RA of course etc. etc.
I'm sorry RA isn't very good with Turkey ...but UK is pretty good. Imagine that.

Ok ...remove all strategies, leave only RA.

I use to play RA Germany all the way to rank 9 actually... over expansion, let my opponent cap Berlin and then recap. ...i lie i played Tank General <3

Why you no adapt to old school RA? ...why you like this noob 90 cost tanks one?

Kirjoittanut Goblin, 19.06.2015 at 14:39

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.06.2015 at 14:23

if ra tanks have no quantity advantage pd will beat him.

-_________________________________________-

And all this time i'm saying its so easy to spam 50 tanks with Bulgaria in 1v1, higher then 10k funds are basically "of course i will pick RA", 5k is also RA of course etc. etc.
I'm sorry RA isn't very good with Turkey ...but UK is pretty good. Imagine that.

Ok ...remove all strategies, leave only RA.

I use to play RA Germany all the way to rank 9 actually... over expansion, let my opponent cap Berlin and then recap. ...i lie i played Tank General <3

Why you no adapt to old school RA? ...why you like this noob 90 cost tanks one?

adapt to old school ? but times change and i am adapted to nowadays strats
bulgaria 1v1 with ra ? easy to counter. but we were talking on competetive 3v3-s and bulgaria ra is suicide there.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.06.2015 at 15:16

bulgaria 1v1 with ra ? easy to counter. but we were talking on competetive 3v3-s and bulgaria ra is suicide there.

I'm not talking only about specific setting, i said that moments ago ...i'm talking about RA in global. Otherwise we could provide an argument that RA isn't too powerful because its kinda hard to play in 3k africa.

And mate... nothing is a problem to counter.
If by adapt you mean picking a counter country... then i'm fucking laughing out loud right now.

Kirjoittanut Goblin, 19.06.2015 at 15:25

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.06.2015 at 15:16

bulgaria 1v1 with ra ? easy to counter. but we were talking on competetive 3v3-s and bulgaria ra is suicide there.

I'm not talking only about specific setting, i said that moments ago ...i'm talking about RA in global. Otherwise we could provide an argument that RA isn't too powerful because its kinda hard to play in 3k africa.

And mate... nothing is a problem to counter.
If by adapt you mean picking a counter country... then i'm fucking laughing out loud right now.

i said counter pd, didn't say counter germany... ofc i mean playstyle and strat.

Hi guys

Let's all take a minute for admire how 164 RA militias eats up almost 1k in upkeep cost.

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 20.06.2015 at 20:11

Hi guys

Let's all take a minute for admire how 164 RA militias eats up almost 1k in upkeep cost.

or you can just calculate it...

anyways RA didn't really need the extra -10 for it to be "playable" though I can see why everyone likes it. It seems like the only nerf we could agree on would be -1 defense to tanks.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 20.06.2015 at 20:18

It seems like the only nerf we could agree on would be -1 defense to tanks.

#StrykoOurBestFriend #Stryko4mod

Agree with -1 def.

Full support for removing ra nerf,but blitz was too op,,now is ok

I like non-moderator acq *love the bitchy side*

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 27.06.2015 at 16:28

I like non-moderator acq *love the bitchy side*

Waffel! You are alive!

Support

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 20.06.2015 at 20:11

Hi guys

Let's all take a minute for admire how 164 RA militias eats up almost 1k in upkeep cost.

Oh wow can't believe i didn't notice this blatant lie... since your picture shows 164 militias upkeep is 556.

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 28.06.2015 at 08:10

No, it shows 656. Which is 1k income rounded up.

Right right 656... and why is that rounded up 1k?

Your claim was 164 militias eat up 1k in upkeep...

should i make a game create does 164 militia but inb4 also create 100 AT's and then claim my 164 militias eat up 656 + 100 AT's - 5500 upkeep cost.

SS post and say "Oh look my 164 militias eat up 6156 upkeep" -.-

Kirjoittanut Goblin, 28.06.2015 at 08:16

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 28.06.2015 at 08:10

No, it shows 656. Which is 1k income rounded up.

Right right 656... and why is that rounded up 1k?

Your claim was 164 militias eat up "Almost"1k in upkeep...

Yup, almost

Lainaa:

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 28.06.2015 at 08:17

Your claim was 164 militias eat up "Almost"1k in upkeep...

Yup, almost

656 is not almost... to be 1000 upkeep its additional 86 militias which is half the stack you produced ...4 units even more then the half of your stack.

Kirjoittanut Azula., 18.06.2015 at 16:27

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 18.06.2015 at 16:24

Kirjoittanut Azula., 18.06.2015 at 16:21

Oh we all know you were one of the guys who pushed it and nice being a hypocrit i see tons of posts about lets nerf ra and you dont bitch on them you even support. Well now here is the freedom of saying what i want and what i know. And if you want to lock this then lock all treads related to nerfing ra not just this one couse you dont like it.

"Sometimes you are right, but the form in which you express yourself makes you lose the reason"

this thread turned into a flaming war ;_;

Thx to this kid who immediately insults by saying what a usless cry tread. Do your homework.
You see what they do? They make it into a flame war so it gets locked and so the resistance of their idea's get silenced.

because you never did that right? coming into threads and give some negative comment which has clearly nothing to do with the thread lol.
Atleast acq's comments were directed to this subject, unlike yours