Hanki Premium piilottaaksesi kaikki mainokset
Postit: 12   Viereailijat: 43 users
09.06.2015 - 07:07
I am sure I have seen this idea posted before but I cannot find the previously made thread to revive. So apoligies in advance for the duplication.

The idea is for all participants of a team game to win a game that their team mates win in the end. The same way the clan war system works.
It is only fair, as players should die and win as a team
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 08:21
Are you saying that a player that was eliminated (defeated) in a team game can still win the game?
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 08:39
Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 08:21

Are you saying that a player that was eliminated (defeated) in a team game can still win the game?

Imagine that I suicide myself to enable you to win a team game, wouldn't it be fair for me to get something as a compensation for that? Besides from a hug, ofc.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 08:44
Kirjoittanut RaulPB, 09.06.2015 at 08:39

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 08:21

Are you saying that a player that was eliminated (defeated) in a team game can still win the game?

Imagine that I suicide myself to enable you to win a team game, wouldn't it be fair for me to get something as a compensation for that? Besides from a hug, ofc.

Yes but not in the same game; wait for the next and I'll go ahuakbar-hara-kiri for you.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 09:00
Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 08:21

Are you saying that a player that was eliminated (defeated) in a team game can still win the game?

yes
If a player is a victim of a 2v1 early rush but the rushers leave themselves weak as a result and the rushing team lose , then the player that was rushed should get the win as he participated and helped his team mates win the game, by being 'cannon fodder'.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 09:10
Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 08:44

Yes but not in the same game; wait for the next and I'll go ahuakbar-hara-kiri for you.

Aw........ !!
But as much as I'd love to see you become my heroe... I'd rather have you alive!
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 17:47
Kirjoittanut Sun Tsu, 09.06.2015 at 09:00

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 08:21

Are you saying that a player that was eliminated (defeated) in a team game can still win the game?

yes
If a player is a victim of a 2v1 early rush but the rushers leave themselves weak as a result and the rushing team lose , then the player that was rushed should get the win as he participated and helped his team mates win the game, by being 'cannon fodder'.

Sounds fair; game still counts as lost but SP gain is higher... or something like that?
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 17:50
Lainaa:
Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:47



Sounds fair; game still counts as lost but SP gain is higher... or something like that?


The win still shows and no reduction in SP. Basically the same way as it would work in a clan war, that the team wins or loses and not individual player's.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 17:52
Lainaa:
Kirjoittanut Sun Tsu, 09.06.2015 at 17:50

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:47



Sounds fair; game still counts as lost but SP gain is higher... or something like that?


The win still shows and no reduction in SP. Basically the same was as it would work in a clan war, that the team wins or loses and not individual player's.

CW being a specific form of team game; is it applicable to all types of team games? Is it the same to have a 3v3 CW or team-game and a any scenario team game or RP team game?
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 17:58
Lainaa:
Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:52

Kirjoittanut Sun Tsu, 09.06.2015 at 17:50

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:47



Sounds fair; game still counts as lost but SP gain is higher... or something like that?


The win still shows and no reduction in SP. Basically the same was as it would work in a clan war, that the team wins or loses and not individual player's.

CW being a specific form of team game; is it applicable to all types of team games? Is it the same to have a 3v3 CW or team-game and a any scenario team game or RP team game?

That I am not sure about, my main thought process is for team games on smaller maps. I guess it would only be fair to include the same rules for any team game regardless of scenario etc. I am not sure really how to elaborate further without making the suggestion overly complex.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
09.06.2015 - 18:06
Stryko
Käyttäjä poistettu
Well some, very few, cws have been played on those RP scenarios so I don't think that would matter.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
16.06.2015 - 11:06
Lainaa:
Kirjoittanut Sun Tsu, 09.06.2015 at 17:58

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:52

Kirjoittanut Sun Tsu, 09.06.2015 at 17:50

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 09.06.2015 at 17:47



Sounds fair; game still counts as lost but SP gain is higher... or something like that?




2/3s of the sp is awarded cause of the whole being dead at the end of the game. and show it in games list in color yellow,
----

Ladataan...
Ladataan...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Yksityisyys | Käyttöehdot | Bannerit | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Liity meihin:

Levitä sanaa