Falco-UN Game Rules (For Cronus UN Map)

Kirjoittanut Guest, 14.10.2014 at 03:33

Your rules are SHIT. Thnx m8 ur constructive criticism is gr8

Rule 3: Can be abused by allyfaggers. Changed so that is has to be a majority of ALL players in the game, less ally shittery

Rule 4: Why bane nukes when you can just decide weather nukes would be fair to use in a war or not? Okay first off, the fire rises, second, it's up to the UN at all times whether nukes are banned or not. So this is exactly how it works.

>swiss bank
Just a useless, boring player. Yeah, there's totally no reason why anyone would ever need extra money mid-game! And OBVIOUSLY nobody would ever want to sit back, relax, and play a passive role in a game while they watch it unfold.
Also, the rules are specifically for the UN Game Cronus map, which has a Swiss bank in it. Thus, rules for the Swiss bank are necessary

Turn 5: Are you serious? This is ATWAR. Turn 4 in RP is bad enough but Turn 5? The traditional UN rule is turn 3 (like RP a bit) This is subject to change after some playtesting

Rule 11: Neutral land? This means the balance of the game can be upset and the game is decided more by luck than skill. Wat. I, uh, I'm not sure what you even mean. How can it upset the balance when this is exactly how it works for the first 10 rounds of a vanilla game anyways? And then afterwords, the swiss bank is auctioning it off for 2 reasons: 1 being that it supplies money for loans, and 2 so that it can give smaller countries a second chance to expand and have fun. I know your response will be something like "But the bigger country worked hard to get there, why let the smaller country get a free ride?" But it's to make sure that people are on a slightly more level playing field, because honestly it just makes the game more fun if you aren't being crushed by some allyfag or troll veteran.

Over all 10/10 bitching. Glad you could be arsed to whine about it. I'll take your considerations into mind.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 14.10.2014 at 14:18

1. ''Why let the smaller country get a free ride''
Holy shit I never thought like that ever. Okay then what did you think? It was difficult to understand what you meant by unbalanced.

2. ''Bane''
Crap happens So it does

3. I DID give constructive criticism. Twas a joke m8

4. Have you ever played as Swiss before? Until you maybe put a rule for it so it can fight wars other wise it just sits on there butt doing absolutely nothing. And I've never seen much people take loans. I've been considering some options to make it a more involved role, but yes I've played as Swiss before, and just because you find it boring does not mean that it can't be fun to others.

5. >Big country with big reinf takes more countries than smaller nation, or big nation threatens smaller nation for the neutral land. Threats are a perfectly good reason to go to war, and if you're a tiny country with no allies to help then maybe it's your own fault. I don't see the problem here

>big country has more money than smaller nation so they win the bid The Swiss bank can decide that a certain country has enough land already, and limit it's purchases until it no longer has an unfair advantage.

Overall 10/10 response its okay. 9.5/10 response-to-a-response had trouble taking a joke

I'd like to make it clear that I am taking into consideration all of your suggestions, and I understand that you probably know much much more about the game than I do, but I myself have some opinions on these matters that differ from yours.

Kirjoittanut Nero, 14.10.2014 at 15:07

Rank 3 UN rules best UN rules

Kirjoittanut Quantum027, 15.10.2014 at 11:47

Most of these are just the normal rules, and side note, why are you making rules to a map that isnt yours and isnt played more than once every other week

Kirjoittanut Guest, 15.10.2014 at 01:52

1. You never said that Swiss had that power. And that power is abusable. These rules are assuming that the host picks players who aren't dicks for Swiss and the UNs
2. It's pure luck based weather that small nation gets good enough allies. Diplomacy is luck based? Wow, I gotta alter my strategery.
3. Also it's stupid as fuck not have every nation balanced. Still not even sure what you mean here
4. My friends played as Swiss, they ca confirm it was boring. Let me use my 1337 copy/paste skills here:

Lainaa:

but yes I've played as Swiss before, and just because you Or in this case your friends find it boring does not mean that it can't be fun to others.

Question, is this for your own UN? No, I made this because I plan to start having semi-regular games on the Cronus UN map, and wanted somewhere to link people so we could all be playing by the same straightforward rules.
Unless that's what you meant, in which case, yes.

>Says I'm butthurt
>Twas a joke m9
._. <3 u bb

Kirjoittanut Guest, 16.10.2014 at 01:15

So you make your OWN rules for a UN that you didn't even collaborate in? Lolwut? First off I couldn't find a decent ruleset for that specific map, if you can find one then my all means, send it to me. I just want a simple, concise, well written ruleset to link people when I start a game. Is that so horrible?

1. Oh and, regarding Swiss Non-friends have also said it's boring. Just because you say it's not boring doesn't mean me and multiple people don't find it boring or that the role it's self isn't boring. I'm done arguing about this. We could go back and forth for a week.

2. Yes, diplomacy is luck based, wanna know why? Different players pick different countries, and they have different plans on what to do. You cannot always be sure if your alliance request go through. I'm not even sure what you're talking about at this point

3. You mention small and bigger countries fighting over neutral from the start of the turn. Maybe don't pick a tiny country then?

4. And it can be tricky to know weather a Swiss won't abuse his power, it can be not as obv as UN rouging. But it's still apparent if you're paying attention. If you see the Swiss giving unfair amounts of land to specific nations, call them out on it.