Political Lobby RP/UN/Others

So i had a great idea a little while ago and it was to have a seperate Lobby for RP and UNs and other maps people find less then satisfactory for traditional atwar, what do you guys think comment and leave suggestions.

Make also 1 vote with : NOBODY CARESSSSSSSSSSSSS D:

So far 4 people care

No, it's a normal game like everything else.

Yes

This is bad idea hell. It will enter the door for so many different lobbies that are pointless. A lobby for WW1 and WW2 games only, lobby for 3v3 EU+ only, lobby for World 50k only, Colonial Scenarios only, other scenarios only, the list goes on and on. AtWar doesn't yet have the community size to worry about over crowding the main lobby. If these RP and UN games are too much for you to see in the lobby than I suggest a game change. Them being there doesn't at all affect you playing a 3v3 game on EU+.

How about we just tag certain games as "Diplomacy" games and add it as a filter. Therefore people who want to play diplomacy games can see all the diplomacy games. Anyone who doesn't play diplomacy games can filter them out.

I don't think it's necessary considering the community size. But what about a new filter option to see Custom/default games only?

No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general

Kirjoittanut the equalizer, 19.05.2014 at 12:29

No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general

I agree but if we do then we will have an uprising they have numbers on us, and its pointless. We are removing a map bc we don't like it? that is so biased and something this community should not become at all EVER!

Kirjoittanut Quantum027, 19.05.2014 at 23:42

Kirjoittanut the equalizer, 19.05.2014 at 12:29

No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general

I agree but if we do then we will have an uprising they have numbers on us, and its pointless. We are removing a map bc we don't like it? that is so biased and something this community should not become at all EVER!

Become to? LOL. Atwar is already biased mate.

I support an 'casuals lobby'

No need to split up lobbies even more. Also it will have the negative effect of deepening the divide between diplo and regular players, to the extent that I can see both sides never going to try other scenarios since they are going to stick to a lobby. My hope is to convert them, not segregate

Kirjoittanut Aetius, 20.05.2014 at 10:46

No need to split up lobbies even more. Also it will have the negative effect of deepening the divide between diplo and regular players, to the extent that I can see both sides never going to try other scenarios since they are going to stick to a lobby. My hope is to convert them, not segregate

Segregation today segregation tomorrow segregation for ever!!!!!