Roguers in RP

All RP is allyfaguing, deal with that.

That why i stop playing role play. i get gangbang by 4 people

Lol, just don't play rp or un adt.

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

Report the players (by providing ScreenShots) to the map-makers and these players can be banned from the respective maps/scenarios. It is not against AW rules, but against some map-specific rules.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 25.02.2015 at 01:33

All RP is allyfaguing, deal with that.

How would you know that?

Support

Lainaa:

Lainaa:

How would you know that?

Lol

RP is for fags, don't play it

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 25.02.2015 at 07:57

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

Report the players (by providing ScreenShots) to the map-makers and these players can be banned from the respective maps/scenarios. It is not against AW rules, but against some map-specific rules.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 25.02.2015 at 01:33

All RP is allyfaguing, deal with that.

How would you know that?

ummm , is allyfaging illegal ? Also I don't see how not following "RP rules" is equivalent to getting banned.
As far as I know there are no map specific rules and as long they don't break atwar rules it doesn't matter.

Yesterday, i was plating a World in 938 scenario.
When i take over China (I Was Japan) and (obviously) get a OP income and reinforcements rate, the noobs France, Turkey and Russia (USA dont included, i was at war already vs him) allyfagued vs me. In scenarios Allyfaguing should be illegal or at least 1 max ally.

Kirjoittanut Tundy, 25.02.2015 at 14:58

RP is for fags, don't play it

Cinco

Do like me quit roleplay in general and go elite

Just a suggestion

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:08

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

I cant physically see every single game on my Roleplay map, So if someone rogues you in a game you need to screenshot it and send it to me through mail. Make sure when taking the screenshot you capture the whole image otherwise it might not even show them being rogue and the ban will be undone by a moderator. Mods have the final say in bans so I cannot help you if it doesn't look legit. Any further information required just private message me bro. Also I can only ban them from Martell's Roleplay for the other maps you will need to message the respected creators.

Please add Guam.and other islands in the Pacific.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:14

Kirjoittanut Skittzophrenic, 26.02.2015 at 23:09

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:08

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

I cant physically see every single game on my Roleplay map, So if someone rogues you in a game you need to screenshot it and send it to me through mail. Make sure when taking the screenshot you capture the whole image otherwise it might not even show them being rogue and the ban will be undone by a moderator. Mods have the final say in bans so I cannot help you if it doesn't look legit. Any further information required just private message me bro. Also I can only ban them from Martell's Roleplay for the other maps you will need to message the respected creators.

Please add Guam.and other islands in the Pacific.

I wont be adding Guam as USA has more territories than any other country on the map.. too many for my liking but if I removed any a lot of Americans would feel hurt like I just offended their ancestors or something like so. I am thinking of adding other islands in the pacific though.

Add Guam!
Add Guam!
No Guam, No Peace! No Guam, No Peace! No Guam, No Peace! No Guam, No Peace!

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 26.02.2015 at 12:34

(some ridiculous complaint)

When you're suddenly the strongest player on the map, quite natural that you have all the other players aligned against you.
Early leader syndrome. Learn to deal with it. Diplomacy is a part of this game.

That being said, mass alliances are a problem. There really needs to be a penalty on having too many allies.
I'll think about it for 30 minutes and post a suggestion somewhere.

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 26.02.2015 at 11:48

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 25.02.2015 at 07:57

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

Report the players (by providing ScreenShots) to the map-makers and these players can be banned from the respective maps/scenarios. It is not against AW rules, but against some map-specific rules.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 25.02.2015 at 01:33

All RP is allyfaguing, deal with that.

How would you know that?

ummm , is allyfaging illegal ? Also I don't see how not following "RP rules" is equivalent to getting banned.
As far as I know there are no map specific rules and as long they don't break atwar rules it doesn't matter.

Players breaking scenario specific rules can be banned from these scenarios if respective SS are provided.
Allyfugging is not illegal, but some scenarios expressive prohibit certain country alliances, since they are OP.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:18

stereo type

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 27.02.2015 at 07:13

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 26.02.2015 at 11:48

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 25.02.2015 at 07:57

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

Report the players (by providing ScreenShots) to the map-makers and these players can be banned from the respective maps/scenarios. It is not against AW rules, but against some map-specific rules.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 25.02.2015 at 01:33

All RP is allyfaguing, deal with that.

How would you know that?

ummm , is allyfaging illegal ? Also I don't see how not following "RP rules" is equivalent to getting banned.
As far as I know there are no map specific rules and as long they don't break atwar rules it doesn't matter.

Players breaking scenario specific rules can be banned from these scenarios if respective SS are provided.
Allyfugging is not illegal, but some scenarios expressive prohibit certain country alliances, since they are OP.

meh, I can't believe this. Why would you even allow scenario specific rules in this game. RP isn't a different game its just a new map in the atwar game.
This basically gives power to RP players to impose stupid and retarded rules. I think you (mods) should seriously reconsider to even allow these rules to be implemented.
Trolling or leaving game is one thing not following so called RP rules is quite another.

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 27.02.2015 at 07:27

meh, I can't believe this. Why would you even allow scenario specific rules in this game. RP isn't a different game its just a new map in the atwar game.
This basically gives power to RP players to impose stupid and retarded rules. I think you (mods) should seriously reconsider to even allow these rules to be implemented.
Trolling or leaving game is one thing not following so called RP rules is quite another.

Why would you care what is going on on RP; you don't play it (like me!).

There are also "unwritten rules" in competitive games! There is even a fraction that considers UK+GER or UKR+TUR as not being good for a CW or 3v3.
RP and UN depend on these rules, ergo, they are necessary for players to be able to enjoy these games. I see absolutely no problem in having these rules; if they allow a portion of the community to enjoy these games.
Besides, we are not "only" talking about RP/UN, but also about other scenarios (existing and/or to come) that require some particular rules so the games can be played smoothly.

Play your competitive games, enjoy them and let other players enjoy their games the way they want.
Does this sound absurd?

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 27.02.2015 at 07:39

Why would you care what is going on on RP; you don't play it (like me!).

There are also "unwritten rules" in competitive games! There is even a fraction that considers UK+GER or UKR+TUR as not being good for a CW or 3v3.
RP and UN depend on these rules, ergo, they are necessary for players to be able to enjoy these games. I see absolutely no problem in having these rules; if they allow a portion of the community to enjoy these games.
Besides, we are not "only" talking about RP/UN, but also about other scenarios (existing and/or to come) that require some particular rules so the games can be played smoothly.

Play your competitive games, enjoy them and let other players enjoy their games the way they want.
Does this sound absurd?

actually I don't think you fully understand the implications of this. Soon enough you would come across players getting gang banged in scenarios and still getting asked to be banned because they broke some stupid scenario rules. I think these are situations you would probably want to avoid. Hence my suggestion.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:14

Kirjoittanut Skittzophrenic, 26.02.2015 at 23:09

Kirjoittanut Guest, 26.02.2015 at 23:08

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON. But so many peolpe are being allyfags and attack each other with fun, not following the RP rules and sending weak countries to heaven. I really do not understand why roguers should play RP or UN, etc. I think there should be a 'kick game vote' that kicks player permanently from the game by voting.

I cant physically see every single game on my Roleplay map, So if someone rogues you in a game you need to screenshot it and send it to me through mail. Make sure when taking the screenshot you capture the whole image otherwise it might not even show them being rogue and the ban will be undone by a moderator. Mods have the final say in bans so I cannot help you if it doesn't look legit. Any further information required just private message me bro. Also I can only ban them from Martell's Roleplay for the other maps you will need to message the respected creators.

Please add Guam.and other islands in the Pacific.

I wont be adding Guam as USA has more territories than any other country on the map.. too many for my liking but if I removed any a lot of Americans would feel hurt like I just offended their ancestors or something like so. I am thinking of adding other islands in the pacific though.

USA too OP in your maps always wins...
Suggestion: Delete all cities in usa except 3 (wash. DC, NYC, and LA)
Whoever plays canada and mexico shall have a feast
GG no re

Kirjoittanut International, 27.02.2015 at 03:37

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 26.02.2015 at 12:34

(some ridiculous complaint)

When you're suddenly the strongest player on the map, quite natural that you have all the other players aligned against you.
Early leader syndrome. Learn to deal with it. Diplomacy is a part of this game.

That being said, mass alliances are a problem. There really needs to be a penalty on having too many allies.
I'll think about it for 30 minutes and post a suggestion somewhere.

International, i hope you don't get angry, but; at least u tried to be a competitive player?

Allyfaguing is bad in Scenarios, and Scenarios are ruined when host decides to let noobs in.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 27.02.2015 at 16:39

International, i hope you don't get angry, but; at least u tried to be a competitive player?

Allyfaguing is bad in Scenarios, and Scenarios are ruined when host decides to let noobs in.

I never get angry, unless someone acts like an idiot - which you evidently are not. So no worries there. You can argue however you wish.

For me, alliances are a pact, an agreement that you will coordinate your movements in order to achieve eliminate certain common threats. So I have little respect for players who ally up merely for the sake of not fighting each other. However, I also believe that there are certain situations where alliances are just logical - for example, when there is a clear early leader that needs to be contained, if any of the others are to have any chance of winning.

To summarize, skillful diplomacy is very much a part of AtWar, but allying half the game for no reason is not skillful diplomacy. That's just cowardice.

Or so I believe. You might have different ideas. Given how you evidently go very heavy on competitive games, while free-for-all games make up maybe 1% of my games list, and I've never played team games at all.

Kirjoittanut Weisser Wolf, 26.02.2015 at 12:34

Yesterday, i was plating a World in 938 scenario.
When i take over China (I Was Japan) and (obviously) get a OP income and reinforcements rate, the noobs France, Turkey and Russia (USA dont included, i was at war already vs him) allyfagued vs me. In scenarios Allyfaguing should be illegal or at least 1 max ally.

thats my 1939, OPest japan since.... idk doesnt matter but ima go mess with it make china more better

Why is there a topic about rogues in rp? like for real, death too rp

This post is complete RPphilia!

Kirjoittanut Guest, 01.03.2015 at 19:44

Guys honestly... if you don't like RP why are you here complaining about it? haha I don't think any of these RP players care... if they did care then they wouldnt make a post about it or actually play RP... just leave them to whatever they want to play and grow up and stop being attention seekers lol..

This guy knows something....

... and most players don't read forum.

Kirjoittanut ADT, 25.02.2015 at 01:25

Roleplay game is doing which doing ROLEPLAY during game and FOLLOWING THE MAP RULES and invade with A VALID REASON.

Bro... take a second and breathe... it's just a game!