Hanki Premium piilottaaksesi kaikki mainokset
Postit: 33   Viereailijat: 80 users

Alkuperäinen viesti

Lähettänyt clovis1122, 12.07.2015 - 14:24
To lead all the RA debates to somewhere, let's just discuss about this simple proposal. After this, if implemented then we can look further into the strategy.

Äänestys

Fair enough?

Sure, but we require a bigger nerf.
22
I can live with it.
14
No support, RA is fine as it is
20

Ääniä yhteensä: 52
15.07.2015 - 13:29
Kirjoittanut Tundy, 12.07.2015 at 20:47

Kirjoittanut AlBoZzZ, 12.07.2015 at 16:41

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 12.07.2015 at 15:25

Why should we allow the community to decide? Why should a r3 who has played for 5 days log the forum and then be allowed to decide how to balance the strategies in the metagame? Logic, reasoning and supporting evidence decide the balance of the strategies. Only experienced players with half a brain can provide this. Polls are useless.


well we certanly cant let people like you decide , or else half of strats would be nerfed already


What are you talking about? If you disagree with any of lao's ideas then make it clear and explain using logic and reason in order to convince people to agree with you. Attacking lao's ideas just because you dislike him is just wrong.

to make it short, ad hominem fallacy.
----



Ladataan...
Ladataan...
15.07.2015 - 13:42
(deleted)
Käyttäjä poistettu
Kirjoittanut Goblin, 15.07.2015 at 10:25


This is like a paranoid apocalyptic scenario xD

it only the truth.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
15.07.2015 - 18:35
 brianwl (Valvoja)
Locked at request of thread creator, as Amok replied.
----

Ladataan...
Ladataan...
  • 1
  • 2
atWar

About Us
Contact

Yksityisyys | Käyttöehdot | Bannerit | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Liity meihin:

Levitä sanaa