Alexmeza casanova

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

you remind me of a 13 year old in that like those in my school when i was that age, being called gay or a faggot was the worst thing in the world. its why i told you to grow up some time ago. and now youre essentially that 13 year old again, pointing and yelling "gay/faggot/cocksucker" in this thread at those who disagree with you.

13 years old. Oh, good times. I was popular, but never a bully.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

alex who apparently hasnt evolved that much in his +3 years, has felt the need to assert that hes not gay at least 5 times in this thread alone.

So if you're gay you're evolved now? LOL. Is this the new, modern man? Putting a penis in your mouth makes you evolved? hahahah

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

are you interested in bringing this debate to the traditional gender roles of men and women? because in that is why it tends to make people uncomfortable, hell it even made me uncomfortable when i was younger and more of an idiot. but now i just dont care.

Don't worry. The family is already destroyed in the USA. Our debate won't change anything. You, together with the other brainwashed masses will continue pushing for the gay agenda untill it's over. This is the world right now. It. Is. Over.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

also have you ever been to france? oh wait yea you call all them faggots too dont you judging by that pr you sent the other day.

French Man is an oxymoron.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

also i ve never seen 2 girls holding hands that werent a couple, and even that grosses some people out. of course im sure you dont mind as long as theyre hot eh?

Really dude? A few days ago I was at the mall and saw two girls walking and holding hands just by accident. Perhaps that's not too common, so let me rephrase: girls are affectionate towards eachother and it's their nature, nothing wrong with that. Man on the other hand, is not. Yin and Yang. Solitude is masculine.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 14.04.2014 at 14:41

and frankly idc if my respect means nothing to you, i find you entertaining on the forums for the most part with your bluntness, but on this subject i frankly think youre a bigoted narrow minded prude

Can't wait for the day your son will come up to you and say "daddyy I like guy"
I think you'll change your mind pretty fucking quick

Peace

Kirjoittanut Columna Durruti, 27.02.2014 at 20:09

^ Fact!

No thats an opinion. Cant you differentiate between a fact and an opinion?

Federal crime statistics are a Fact. Claims of prejudice or negative connotation of those opinions are an opinion. No wonder you guys are Commie anarchists.

Kirjoittanut Pinheiro, 28.02.2014 at 05:59

There's no hypocrisy, just a few homophobic people.

Says the guy with an avatar of a man who was a well known public figure who not only despised Homosexuals but imprisoned them in Labour camps and executed them.

Are the communists on this website satirical characters mocking actual communists? I just dont know anymore.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 14.04.2014 at 16:32

i am not gay x20 times

ok we believe you..jeesus..lol

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 14.04.2014 at 07:31

her pussy has man dookey particles in it.

let me fuck with your brain a little

there are more possibilities of man dookey particles found in your mouth than on a woman who has sex with gay men..

let me explain..a usual female will wash her genitals about twice per day,a gay man about the same.Counting also than in both acts,gay sex and straight sex,people likely used condoms,the possibilities of man dookey in the females genitals are rather unlikely.

On the other hand,scientifically speaking,the toilet is on the top 3 of the greatest sources of bacteria in your house.(along with doorknobs and computer mouse).It has dookey partciles and urine particles also.All it takes is for you to leave the lid open once.Imagine the inside of the toilet like a spray,spraying everything around it in a radious of around 10 feet, if i remember correctly.So the possibilities of dookey particles flying from the inside of your toilet to your toothbrush and your bath sponge are about 100% ..

food for thought

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 06:27

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 14.04.2014 at 07:31

her pussy has man dookey particles in it.

let me fuck with your brain a little

there are more possibilities of man dookey particles found in your mouth than on a woman who has sex with gay men..

let me explain..a usual female will wash her genitals about twice per day,a gay man about the same.Counting also than in both acts,gay sex and straight sex,people likely used condoms,the possibilities of man dookey in the females genitals are rather unlikely.

On the other hand,scientifically speaking,the toilet is on the top 3 of the greatest sources of bacteria in your house.(along with doorknobs and computer mouse).It has dookey partciles and urine particles also.All it takes is for you to leave the lid open once.Imagine the inside of the toilet like a spray,spraying everything around it in a radious of around 10 feet, if i remember correctly.So the possibilities of dookey particles flying from the inside of your toilet to your toothbrush and your bath sponge are about 100% ..

food for thought

Next thing you know, Laochra will start kissing door knobs and eating his bath sponge.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 03:53

So if you're gay you're evolved now? LOL. Is this the new, modern man? Putting a penis in your mouth makes you evolved? hahahah - See more at: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=12459&message_id=146931#m146931

where did i say being gay makes you evolved?i was obviously referring to your 1900s generation attitude towards homosexuality.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 03:53

Don't worry. The family is already destroyed in the USA. Our debate won't change anything. You, together with the other brainwashed masses will continue pushing for the gay agenda untill it's over. This is the world right now. It. Is. Over. - See more at: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=12459&message_id=146931#m146931

i dont appreciate repeating myself, but perhaps you didnt believe me the first time. i dont give 2 fucks about what the media says, im able to develop my own opinion as ive actually been out in the world and met real people.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 03:53

French Man is an oxymoron.
Really dude? A few days ago I was at the mall and saw two girls walking and holding hands just by accident. Perhaps that's not too common, so let me rephrase: girls are affectionate towards eachother and it's their nature, nothing wrong with that. Man on the other hand, is not. Yin and Yang. Solitude is masculine. - See more at: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=12459&message_id=146931#m146931

you speak of brain washing, apparently you have some media/traditionallly brainwashed view of what a man should be. "man should get wood for fire and fuck many women!!" i think you might need to break through a few stereotypes. not all gay people are squeaky voiced effeminate hairdressers/nurses. same with the women, theyre not all skinhead militant feminists.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 03:53

Can't wait for the day your son will come up to you and say "daddyy I like guy" I think you'll change your mind pretty fucking quick - See more at: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=12459&message_id=146931#m146931

if someday i have a son, i would hope to instill good morals, toughness, self belief and diligence, qualities i believe are important for any man. if my son came home one day and told me he was gay, i would accept it. my only concern is that today its a harder path, mainly because of prejudice and attitudes like yours. you know how many young people find out theyre gay and kill themselves? Congratulations, you're contributing to that problem with your attitude. and just because of a fear of dookey lol. when someday you go to shove your dick up a girls ass, it will be just as unhygenic, no matter how awesome you might find it.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 07:41

Next thing you know, Laochra will start kissing door knobs and eating his bath sponge.

lol at least we could say something for you if your attitude was religiously influenced. we could say youre a man of faith sticking to what your bible tells you. but no you're just the equivalent of a little girl screaming "EWWWWWWWWWWW DOOKEY".

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 08:10

Où ai-je dis qu'être gay fait vous évolué? j'étais évidemment allusion à votre attitude de génération des années 1900 envers l'homosexualité.

Sorry. I don't speak French because I'm a Man.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 09:55

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 08:10

Où ai-je dis qu'être gay fait vous évolué? j'étais évidemment allusion à votre attitude de génération des années 1900 envers l'homosexualité.

Sorry. I don't speak French because I'm a Man.

No, because you're not a coward.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 08:29

lol at least we could say something for you if your attitude was religiously influenced. we could say youre a man of faith sticking to what your bible tells you. but no you're just the equivalent of a little girl screaming "EWWWWWWWWWWW DOOKEY".

1:25
So which one is it?

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:15

1:25
So which one is it?

do you not read peoples posts? that you must regurgitate questions that have already been answered? did i not point out that all gay people arent all effeminate hairstylists? i dont even know where you found that vid and why you were watching it, but you and that guy seem to have al these preconceived stereotypes of gay people, possibly from the media. have you ever actually met real gay people?

and lol, i can only imagine, what tiktok would have to say about that vid.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 17:31

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:15

1:25
So which one is it?

do you not read peoples posts? that you must regurgitate questions that have already been answered? did i not point out that all gay people arent all effeminate hairstylists? i dont even know where you found that vid and why you were watching it, but you and that guy seem to have al these preconceived stereotypes of gay people, possibly from the media. have you ever actually met real gay people?

and lol, i can only imagine, what tiktok would have to say about that vid.

You didn't even watch.

Back then it was a mental illness. Nowadays it's normal? So which one is it? Today it's a mental ilness and tommorow it's a normal thing? So being mentally ill is normal now? Hahah. I know you will dodge this and come up with some bullshit like "not all are like this not all are like that". Manly gay people? You are ridiculous.

Corey is a comedian, but this show was about serious issues & truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efwInvJ2n9U

I want to slap that annoying black dude, real hard.Maybe cut him with a knife,pass him through with a spear and then shoot him with a shotgun.If still alive burn with fire(he is a huge dude )

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:56

You didn't even watch.

Back then it was a mental illness. Nowadays it's normal? So which one is it? Today it's a mental illness and tommorow it's a normal thing? So being mentally ill is normal now? Hahah. I know you will dodge this and come up with some bullshit like "not all are like this not all are like that". Manly gay people? You are ridiculous.

Corey is a comedian, but this show was about serious issues & truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efwInvJ2n9U

i watched enough, and is that even a real question? are you for real? do i actually have to explain the why of that to you?

also im laughing at your manly gay people comment. just goes to highlight your naive and narrowminded attitude. what exactly is your definition of a manly man? is it certain occupations or hobbies? i can guarantee you theres probably faggots doing them all. so naive of you to believe the traits that you admire in your fellow man are influenced by his sexuality.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 18:32

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:56

You didn't even watch.

Back then it was a mental illness. Nowadays it's normal? So which one is it? Today it's a mental illness and tommorow it's a normal thing? So being mentally ill is normal now? Hahah. I know you will dodge this and come up with some bullshit like "not all are like this not all are like that". Manly gay people? You are ridiculous.

Corey is a comedian, but this show was about serious issues & truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efwInvJ2n9U

i watched enough, and is that even a real question? are you for real? do i actually have to explain the why of that to you?

also im laughing at your manly gay people comment. just goes to highlight your naive and narrowminded attitude. what exactly is your definition of a manly man? is it certain occupations or hobbies? i can guarantee you theres probably faggots doing them all. so naive of you to believe the traits that you admire in your fellow man are influenced by his sexuality.

We're supposed to laugh, no need to be serious all the time. It's not a thread about murder.

Here's an occupation that a man doesn't have: dookey digger.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 18:32

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:56

You didn't even watch.

Back then it was a mental illness. Nowadays it's normal? So which one is it? Today it's a mental illness and tommorow it's a normal thing? So being mentally ill is normal now? Hahah. I know you will dodge this and come up with some bullshit like "not all are like this not all are like that". Manly gay people? You are ridiculous.

Corey is a comedian, but this show was about serious issues & truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efwInvJ2n9U

i watched enough, and is that even a real question? are you for real? do i actually have to explain the why of that to you?

Yes. You have to explain. Stop dodging that question.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 18:43

Yes. You have to explain. Stop dodging that question.

please highlight where ive dodged or not addressed any of your queeries ( ) theories or opinions?

firstly do you understand how much has changed in the past 40 years? technologcially medically, the influence of religion, media everything. we live in a different world, why is it surprising that something defined as a mental illness in a more conservative time could now be viewed as something normal? heres a quick extract from an article i just read. it basically said what i expected

Some psychologists and psychiatrists still hold negative personal attitudes toward homosexuality. However, empirical evidence and professional norms do not support the idea that homosexuality is a form of mental illness or is inherently linked to psychopathology.
The foregoing should not be construed as an argument that sexual minority individuals are free from mental illness and psychological distress. Indeed, given the stresses created by sexual stigma and prejudice, it would be surprising if some of them did not manifest psychological problems (Meyer, 2003).

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 18:57

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 18:43

Yes. You have to explain. Stop dodging that question.

please highlight where ive dodged or not addressed any of your queeries ( ) theories or opinions?

firstly do you understand how much has changed in the past 40 years? technologcially medically, the influence of religion, media everything. we live in a different world, why is it surprising that something defined as a mental illness in a more conservative time could now be viewed as something normal? heres a quick extract from an article i just read. it basically said what i expected

Some psychologists and psychiatrists still hold negative personal attitudes toward homosexuality. However, empirical evidence and professional norms do not support the idea that homosexuality is a form of mental illness or is inherently linked to psychopathology.
The foregoing should not be construed as an argument that sexual minority individuals are free from mental illness and psychological distress. Indeed, given the stresses created by sexual stigma and prejudice, it would be surprising if some of them did not manifest psychological problems (Meyer, 2003).

So why do you feel the need to defend dookey hunters if you're not one of them? Men who talk, gesture, and act like women are a disgrace to the ancestors of this species.

"If the men who lead this country fuck eachother in the ass, we're not going anywhere"

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 16.04.2014 at 03:27

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 18:57

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 18:43

Yes. You have to explain. Stop dodging that question.

please highlight where ive dodged or not addressed any of your queeries ( ) theories or opinions?

firstly do you understand how much has changed in the past 40 years? technologcially medically, the influence of religion, media everything. we live in a different world, why is it surprising that something defined as a mental illness in a more conservative time could now be viewed as something normal? heres a quick extract from an article i just read. it basically said what i expected

Some psychologists and psychiatrists still hold negative personal attitudes toward homosexuality. However, empirical evidence and professional norms do not support the idea that homosexuality is a form of mental illness or is inherently linked to psychopathology.
The foregoing should not be construed as an argument that sexual minority individuals are free from mental illness and psychological distress. Indeed, given the stresses created by sexual stigma and prejudice, it would be surprising if some of them did not manifest psychological problems (Meyer, 2003).

So why do you feel the need to defend dookey hunters if you're not one of them? Men who talk, gesture, and act like women are a disgrace to the ancestors of this species.

"If the men who lead this country fuck eachother in the ass, we're not going anywhere"

ive had friends come out over my time in secondary school and now college, cool people who i know and respect, 2 in particular, and not all dookey diggers some bush bashers . but their sexuality didnt change them a bit, and im pretty sure they cant do anything to change it

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 18:43

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 18:32

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 17:56

You didn't even watch.

Back then it was a mental illness. Nowadays it's normal? So which one is it? Today it's a mental illness and tommorow it's a normal thing? So being mentally ill is normal now? Hahah. I know you will dodge this and come up with some bullshit like "not all are like this not all are like that". Manly gay people? You are ridiculous.

Corey is a comedian, but this show was about serious issues & truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efwInvJ2n9U

i watched enough, and is that even a real question? are you for real? do i actually have to explain the why of that to you?

Yes. You have to explain. Stop dodging that question.

Apparently your intolerance and ignorance knows no bounds, and you have provided additional evidence that the difference between you and a religious zealot is merely that the religious zealot has friends.

I have literally never heard of a Western atheist who is also homophobic - the two viewpoints are theoretically reconcilable, but in practical terms, mutually incompatible - again, this is because in the West atheism is highly correlated with skepticism and intelligence, and homophobia is highly correlated with ignorance and stupidity.

You're very much like a kitten that believes in the scientific method. You might be right, but, meow, have no idea why that is.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 15.04.2014 at 17:31

and lol, i can only imagine, what tiktok would have to say about that vid.

Why would he? Just to have it removed by the stalinist mods? Mods who want communism while supporting gayism, lol.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 16.04.2014 at 04:19

ive had friends come out over my time in secondary school and now college, cool people who i know and respect, 2 in particular, and not all dookey diggers some bush bashers . but their sexuality didnt change them a bit, and im pretty sure they cant do anything to change it

You are your friends. You are the people you surround yourself with. You cannot aim higher than the lowest of the people around you. Men aren't supposed to have shit stains in the front of their underpants.

After another encounter I think it's safe to declare the following:

Laochra is oficially gay.

Mods pls lock this thread.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 18.04.2014 at 13:47

After another encounter I think it's safe to declare the following:

Laochra is oficially gay.

Mods pls lock this thread.

Takes one to know one :-o

Kirjoittanut Cpt.Magic, 18.04.2014 at 14:37

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 18.04.2014 at 13:47

After another encounter I think it's safe to declare the following:

Laochra is oficially gay.

Mods pls lock this thread.

Takes one to know one :-o

OMG, I got exposed :O

Interesting thread. It nicely ties together many things.

We all know Unleashed hates religion, especially Catholicism. As in violently, all-consuming hatred.
We all know Unleashed hates gay men. In an equally unreasoning way.
We all know Unleashed hates priests (they held 'all the land').
Those that follow most of his posts know that he ties (without citing the argument) child abuse to religion.
Logically, Unleashed is currently a child, or was once a child. Certainly his reasoning ability is child-like.

So, does anyone disagree with the premises above before I continue?
Premise 1: Unleashed hates Catholicism.
P2: Unleashed hates Gay men.
P3: Unleashed hates priests.
P4: Unleashed believes religion is child abuse.
P5: Unleashed is currently, or once was, a child.

Actually, I don't really need to extend the argument, I'll let any reasonable person draw their own conclusions.
That being said my pity extends with my recent revelation, and while I understand his rage a bit better, it explains, but doesn't excuse, his intolerance.

It's 4Ps, if he hates religion preists are included.

My conclusion:

He's a hypocrite who doesn't know shit about history.

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.04.2014 at 02:23

It's 4Ps, if he hates religion preists are included.

My conclusion:

He's a hypocrite who doesn't know shit about history.

yawn. You are one stubborn kid. I am against child abuse, but for what you keep doing, you deserve to be punched in the face. Stupid child.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 19.04.2014 at 02:26

Kirjoittanut Guest, 19.04.2014 at 02:23

It's 4Ps, if he hates religion preists are included.

My conclusion:

He's a hypocrite who doesn't know shit about history.

yawn. You are one stubborn kid. I am against child abuse, but for what you keep doing, you deserve to be punched in the face. Stupid child.

You proved me right.

And is it child abuse, if I tell a kid ''do something very evil and the government can execute you''? Well hell no, but according to you it IS child abuse

Go away. You bore me to death.

Kirjoittanut Unleashed, 19.04.2014 at 02:54

Go away. You bore me to death.

More evading