Peacefagging

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 04.11.2014 at 10:20

I laughed when i read this thread title, laughed again when i saw who made it.

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 03.11.2014 at 16:58

Both peace and ally are valid tactics.

someone put this on clovis' profile.

Okai? nice bitching tho.
You always say I come up to threads and ruin them and whatever or add things which are useless and you never do.
Well this is an perfect example.

Kirjoittanut Cthulhu, 04.11.2014 at 11:03

Just wait till i teach you guys about secret peace and secret allies, you will probably try to fix that too. How about just deal with it, it was never a problem to begin with for me. Real world politics will never be FFA

Just FYI, when I played worldgames/europegames with FFA I actually saw clanmembers fighting eachother and not secretfagging (maybe some noobs). The oldskool people were more respective towards game rules, towards players and towards clans. All I see nowdays are lame people/trolls/''trying to be serious'' people. The whole gameplay compared to the one 1 or 2 years ago is verry different and thats because the people are. So ofcourse it was never a bigg problem in the past. But new people come, new gamestyles/rules come and have to come.

Kirjoittanut RaulPB, 04.11.2014 at 03:55

In that case, pls tell me how would you avoid having a guy that peaces everyone but you... and you also shouldn't forget that you have your own bussines to attend (more opponents coming at you)

Peace everybody but me? Well then I do the same!!!!! GG

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 04.11.2014 at 10:20

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 03.11.2014 at 16:58

Both peace and ally are valid tactics.

someone put this on clovis' profile.

Watch this chase

The situation: learster with full europe and middle east, landing on india. A lowrank in USA and most of america. Laochra as china southwest/northwest/indochina, and me with south/southeast/north both koreas taiwan mongolia russia far east and full japan.

After watch learster kill india:

[pr] clovis1122: Laochra: pls let ally for kill learster
[pr] Laochra: he is too strong.
[pr] Laochra: we dont have a chance.
[pr] clovis1122: And what do you prefer? killing each others until learster comes or fight him back and try to survive?
[pr] Laochra: against learster with full europe. Sorry I prefer to have some fun before die.

--------- some turns later--------

[pr] clovis1122: Laochra: bla this suck
[pr] clovis1122: Laochra: ok I will leave. Let me emply my stuff for you.

*Laochra emply his stuff then leaves*

[pr] Laochra: I was going to leave anyway.

------------- results-----------

I made learster fall back to iran. I faced and won whole india against him ( he had full india before I even take lao's territories). Only lost by 200 SP difference, while I was over 700+ when I started fighting him in turn 30.


Just getting up this chase. But people like The Tactician and Stryko probably know more about diplomarcy than me.

One day, Stryko legitm beat me, but yet he still let me recap and ally me. Why? because I was MoS. We allied that game for fight the strong allyfag between usa and asia. And we won. I dont dunno stryko would has won the game alone anyway ( because china high rank still was fighting) but the alliance makes it a lot easier. I go for america and africa, and he go for asia.

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 04.11.2014 at 11:31

Kirjoittanut Cthulhu, 04.11.2014 at 11:03

Just wait till i teach you guys about secret peace and secret allies, you will probably try to fix that too. How about just deal with it, it was never a problem to begin with for me. Real world politics will never be FFA

Just FYI, when I played worldgames/europegames with FFA I actually saw clanmembers fighting eachother and not secretfagging (maybe some noobs). The oldskool people were more respective towards game rules, towards players and towards clans. All I see nowdays are lame people/trolls/''trying to be serious'' people. The whole gameplay compared to the one 1 or 2 years ago is verry different and thats because the people are. So ofcourse it was never a bigg problem in the past. But new people come, new gamestyles/rules come and have to come.

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 04.11.2014 at 22:13

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 04.11.2014 at 11:31

Kirjoittanut Cthulhu, 04.11.2014 at 11:03

Just wait till i teach you guys about secret peace and secret allies, you will probably try to fix that too. How about just deal with it, it was never a problem to begin with for me. Real world politics will never be FFA

Just FYI, when I played worldgames/europegames with FFA I actually saw clanmembers fighting eachother and not secretfagging (maybe some noobs). The oldskool people were more respective towards game rules, towards players and towards clans. All I see nowdays are lame people/trolls/''trying to be serious'' people. The whole gameplay compared to the one 1 or 2 years ago is verry different and thats because the people are. So ofcourse it was never a bigg problem in the past. But new people come, new gamestyles/rules come and have to come.

There should be an option in the banlist with: click here to ban from your forums

<3, not for you but for clovis.

Bla

Support