Blitz needs some rebalancing

I think the +1 range buff to blitz was a very good buff, but blitz is now a little too strong and should be reigned back a little.
I think blitz militia should go back to the +3 range previously and not get the additional +1 range from the buff.
Right now, blitz militia can move as far as infantry and that is a little too strong. They are basically 30 cost 3 att (imp infantry) that can't defend and they should be nerfed.

Discuss

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 16:49

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Like I said, blitz milita goes back to +3 range instead of +4

Support

Agreed it does need a nerf though will the milita nerf be enough?

Support for the ditch dogtor

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 23.05.2020 at 17:30

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 16:49

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Like I said, blitz milita goes back to +3 range instead of +4

Good idea, but that's not really what I had in mind. When I think of blitz I don't want to think of just long range with weak defense. I feel the entire strategy needs to be reworked.

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 19:00

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 23.05.2020 at 17:30

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 16:49

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Like I said, blitz milita goes back to +3 range instead of +4

Good idea, but that's not really what I had in mind. When I think of blitz I don't want to think of just long range with weak defense. I feel the entire strategy needs to be reworked.

yeah delete the strat

Kirjoittanut boywind2, 23.05.2020 at 19:04

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 19:00

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 23.05.2020 at 17:30

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 16:49

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Like I said, blitz milita goes back to +3 range instead of +4

Good idea, but that's not really what I had in mind. When I think of blitz I don't want to think of just long range with weak defense. I feel the entire strategy needs to be reworked.

yeah delete the strat

I honestly wouldnt mind

No

No

Kirjoittanut Croat, 23.05.2020 at 19:10

No

drolja !

Is this blitz the same blitz as it was back then "when it was op"?
I have a memory of a fucking goldfish.

No

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 19:04

Kirjoittanut boywind2, 23.05.2020 at 19:04

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 19:00

Kirjoittanut Witch-Doctor, 23.05.2020 at 17:30

Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 23.05.2020 at 16:49

I agree that the strategy is very strong. Although I can't think of anything at the moment for what should be changed.

Like I said, blitz milita goes back to +3 range instead of +4

Good idea, but that's not really what I had in mind. When I think of blitz I don't want to think of just long range with weak defense. I feel the entire strategy needs to be reworked.

yeah delete the strat

I honestly wouldnt mind

my precious blitz turkey...
also need blitz uk in ww1 and blitz uk/usa in neu ww2 to move the forts from the supplies to ally cap them and also to be able to still suicide the supplies by reusing the supply ships which are meant to die with them so NO

I don't even have blitz yet T_T

This is the worst idea I've ever read. Witch-Doctor is clearly too narrow-minded to fully grasp the entire Blitz-dynamic. His anti-blitz bias is evident to even the most autistic among us, and we should not consider his case valid.

Kirjoittanut Tribune Aquila, 23.05.2020 at 22:26

This is the worst idea I've ever read. Witch-Doctor is clearly too narrow-minded to fully grasp the entire Blitz-dynamic. His anti-blitz bias is evident to even the most autistic among us, and we should not consider his case valid.

i was wondering when you would show up...

Kirjoittanut Tribune Aquila, 23.05.2020 at 22:26

This is the worst idea I've ever read. Witch-Doctor is clearly too narrow-minded to fully grasp the entire Blitz-dynamic. His anti-blitz bias is evident to even the most autistic among us, and we should not consider his case valid.

Favorite strategies: Blitzkrieg, Perfect Defence, Lucky Bastard

D O N'T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G IN B L I T Z

It currently requires 0 effort to play, the milita are cancerous especially, too much value for their range and stats, you get them in every neutral and it tips off every game, best solution is to decrease their range -1, secondary solution is to make them 40 cost.
Pick one.

As De Gaulle famously remarked:




Non.

This marked as unred only for me or smth

Blitz is v strong in its new form but personally I'm not convinced it needs a nerf. It still has the same weaknesses.

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 24.05.2020 at 16:44

Blitz is v strong in its new form but personally I'm not convinced it needs a nerf. It still has the same weaknesses.

not if u cancer wall

Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 24.05.2020 at 16:44

Blitz is v strong in its new form but personally I'm not convinced it needs a nerf. It still has the same weaknesses.

shoulda seen what 4nic did in our cyni cw... imagine a won west and you're turkey with 170 units to ukraines 180...and you for some reason try to rush kiev, but get 30 tbd stiff in the ocean, and your cap raped... and suddenly your won west means nothing to a full east....

Kirjoittanut Sphinx, 24.05.2020 at 18:37

shoulda seen what 4nic did in our cyni cw... imagine a won west and you're turkey with 170 units to ukraines 180...and you for some reason try to rush kiev, but get 30 tbd stiff in the ocean, and your cap raped... and suddenly your won west means nothing to a full east....

T_T

No

It's just good, like every strat should be. But it's not good enought to be nerfed, it's not a lb or ins situation where it's clearly dominant, so no.

Kirjoittanut Apocalypse, 28.05.2020 at 04:34

It's just good, like every strat should be. But it's not good enought to be nerfed, it's not a lb or ins situation where it's clearly dominant, so no.

it's your most played strat... no wonder you'd support it being too powerful.