Team games

I believe team games should be a free thing.

Just ask or PM a player that looks like they have premium to make a game for you. At least in the mean time.

Just buy the game

Kirjoittanut tophat, 31.08.2011 at 22:46

Just buy the game

...



100% agreed with OP. game settings should be given (rare units, additional cities, etc) to the player to start out with, games are already monotonous enough, why drive 50% of new players away because they can't make a standard game?

Why would someone pay for premium in that case? Developers have to earn money somehow...

Kirjoittanut Caulerpa, 01.09.2011 at 12:14

Why would someone pay for premium in that case? Developers have to earn money somehow...

²

Kirjoittanut Caulerpa, 01.09.2011 at 12:14

Why would someone pay for premium in that case? Developers have to earn money somehow...

by blocking features that are pretty much necessary to play the game? no...

the global restrictions and new strategies are enough to pay for

Necessary? You can play game without 100 cities or team games, and it's still great. And btw you can still play with that settings if someone who pays for premium creates a game.
This game really has fair premium price (about 1 dollar per week with SMS, and with PayPal it's even cheaper...), and premium users are not over powered.
I would leave it the way it is now.

Why do you hate 100 cities so much? It only makes the game better.

Kirjoittanut Caulerpa, 02.09.2011 at 16:58

Necessary? You can play game without 100 cities or team games, and it's still great. And btw you can still play with that settings if someone who pays for premium creates a game.
This game really has fair premium price (about 1 dollar per week with SMS, and with PayPal it's even cheaper...), and premium users are not over powered.
I would leave it the way it is now.

it's not just 100 cities, its rare units as well...these features are important, yet i'm not exactly sure somebody would cater a package around features (I myself would rather pay for strategies)

having full access to game settings is something that shouldn't be taken for granted, and not everyone has access to a paypal let alone would be allowed to use it.

last thing...a dollar a week? I thought these subscriptions were supposed to bring in money?

Kirjoittanut Fruit, 02.09.2011 at 19:18

Why do you hate 100 cities so much? It only makes the game better.

I agree, don't hate it, I am just not used to playing it with it.

So start playing with it, more often than not it's 100 additional

Kirjoittanut VAGlNEER 2.0, 03.09.2011 at 00:59

Kirjoittanut Caulerpa, 02.09.2011 at 16:58

Necessary? You can play game without 100 cities or team games, and it's still great. And btw you can still play with that settings if someone who pays for premium creates a game.
This game really has fair premium price (about 1 dollar per week with SMS, and with PayPal it's even cheaper...), and premium users are not over powered.
I would leave it the way it is now.

it's not just 100 cities, its rare units as well...these features are important, yet i'm not exactly sure somebody would cater a package around features (I myself would rather pay for strategies)

having full access to game settings is something that shouldn't be taken for granted, and not everyone has access to a paypal let alone would be allowed to use it.

last thing...a dollar a week? I thought these subscriptions were supposed to bring in money?

With this prices everyone (and i mean everyone) can pay for premium... I don't have paypal so I pay with SMS (it's like 3-4 euros per month). And those who still don't want to pay, don't have some big disadvantages in game, only few minor things like scenarios, 100 cities and team games. Please don't say these things are very important and you can't play without it, I mean they can still play with that settings, they just can't create a game like that. Not a big disadvantage IMHO.

Kirjoittanut VAGlNEER 2.0, 03.09.2011 at 00:59

it's not just 100 cities, its rare units as well...these features are important, yet i'm not exactly sure somebody would cater a package around features (I myself would rather pay for strategies)

I've heard from some players already that they would buy premium features just to make 100+ cities games. In my opinion, that's the main objective.

Kirjoittanut Pinheiro, 03.09.2011 at 09:47

Kirjoittanut VAGlNEER 2.0, 03.09.2011 at 00:59

it's not just 100 cities, its rare units as well...these features are important, yet i'm not exactly sure somebody would cater a package around features (I myself would rather pay for strategies)

I've heard from some players already that they would buy premium features just to make 100+ cities games. In my opinion, that's the main objective.

I mean if it's the main method of making money, at least give the newbies a way to change rare unit rates...rare units are p game breaking most of the time

and i'm still amazed that premium is a dollar a week (idk if caulerpa is bsing me or not)...

In Croatia 7 HRK for 7 days (it becomes 10 when you extend) and that's like 1 euro for 10 days

Is Anti-Aircraft still a premium only feature? That's the only one that I think is unfair.

Updates do not need so much SP in premium.