Reduce price of infs by 10 for HW

HW as a strat is sort of like expanded gc. But something I don't get is why the price of infs are +10. It makes them expensive and at the same price as marines. Further more -3 attack for infs means they are next to useless in attack. They still have +1 def which is ok but price +10 makes them rather expensive. I propose we let the price of infs remain constant(that is decrease the current price by10), since you have already nerfed the attack by huge extent.

And for people saying this will make them OP(most common argument I get here), please try playing HW first and then comment.

Support, this way its HW becomes a little more balanced

Support.. We need more competative strategies, and HW is useless right now.

Support as it would improve hw. but itll still be a weak strat.

I suggest removing the +10 cost for tank and infantry. i mean infantry already get reduce attack for infantry and reduce defence for tanks already.

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 01.03.2015 at 00:47

And for people saying this will make them OP(most common argument I get here), please try playing HW first and then comment.

Done.

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 01.03.2015 at 00:47

HW as a strat is sort of like expanded gc

[...]

Disagree just by this statement. I am aware there are many styles of play this strategy, but IMO the GW/PD one is the best.

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 01.03.2015 at 06:36

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 01.03.2015 at 00:47

And for people saying this will make them OP(most common argument I get here), please try playing HW first and then comment.

Done.

Kirjoittanut minusSeven, 01.03.2015 at 00:47

HW as a strat is sort of like expanded gc

[...]

Disagree just by this statement. I am aware there are many styles of play this strategy, but IMO the GW/PD one is the best.

how is HW op?

Support HW suka!

Kirjoittanut Htin, 01.03.2015 at 07:42

how is HW op?

I am just saying that my style of playing HW is playing it like GW/PD.

I've dominated 3 whole world games already with this strategy.

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 01.03.2015 at 09:23

Kirjoittanut Htin, 01.03.2015 at 07:42

how is HW op?

I am just saying that my style of playing HW is playing it like GW/PD.

I've dominated 3 whole world games already with this strategy.

is it good in duel?

Kirjoittanut Htin, 01.03.2015 at 09:32

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 01.03.2015 at 09:23

Kirjoittanut Htin, 01.03.2015 at 07:42

how is HW op?

I am just saying that my style of playing HW is playing it like GW/PD.

I've dominated 3 whole world games already with this strategy.

is it good in duel?

on any map with the default units, hw is not good anywhere. In literally every situation you can play hw, there is a better strat choice.

HW has the potential to become really good if we keep tweaking it.

Eventually, I am hoping for a -10 cost on INF (-20 and it will be really competitive in 3v3)

Kirjoittanut Cthulhu, 30.07.2013 at 05:07

...

I suggest removing that cost altogether.

Hybrid warfare is essentially a land warfare strategy, and its air unit suck (horribly, like with teeth). In addition, the infantry is not an OP unit, because it can only defend, but why make it cost your entire economy to defend?

In addition, I would think removing the cost to inf would make more players attracted to Hybrid Warfare.

...

+1hp for all units would be nice either

Kirjoittanut SyrianDevil, 02.03.2015 at 05:55

+1hp for all units would be nice either

and -10 in tanks