|
Good to see that some variation is being applied, and that's a starting. Of course you won't get everyone happy... this might lead to future changes anyway. If scenarios are ruined, then tell your players picking that strat is forbidden, while it's gone or balanced. If we applied anything new with previous discussion it will take years to apply, just like LB and DS nerf, how many pages of posts there's already? Just let it happen.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Http://prntscr.com/mgnwq5
Nerf it by -1 attack.
----
https://prnt.sc/W3aEpwbpEwEU
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Put back the 40 for milita. People don't realize that this is an EXPENSIVE strategy same as Sky Menace Desert Storm and Master of Stealth. It should not be played in lower income setting games. People are upset because they can't just RUSH turn 1 and have to actually expand and play the game. The people complaining don't know how to play anything besides Lucky Bastard.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 04.02.2019 at 16:14
Put back the 40 for milita. People don't realize that this is an EXPENSIVE strategy same as Sky Menace Desert Storm and Master of Stealth. It should not be played in lower income setting games. People are upset because they can't just RUSH turn 1 and have to actually expand and play the game. The people complaining don't know how to play anything besides Lucky Bastard.
You should give "people" more credit. And your reasoning is poor. Sm and ds are played on midrange starting fund settings and lb is more expensive in its current form than all those strats. Even sky menace.
My question is why can't "people" understand how significant it is to give the most cost efficient unit in the game that all strats acquire through expansion a 33% cost increase.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut PleaseMe, 04.02.2019 at 16:14
You should give "people" more credit. And your reasoning is poor. Sm and ds are played on midrange starting fund settings and lb is more expensive in its current form than all those strats. Even sky menace.
My question is why can't "people" understand how significant it is to give the most cost efficient unit in the game that all strats acquire through expansion a 33% cost increase.
Because that's how you get a VERY broken strategy. I understand the logic behind "if everyone can use it then it's okay". But once EVERYONE only uses that strat because it is superior to everything else then that is definitely when it needs a nerf.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
That strategy feels terrible to play with. Essentially, i am just dragging militia around. I don't need to worry about income. Just take the next capital because I will get more cancerous units to expand with.
With the transports nerfed I can't even properly chain units. Every move becomes predictable.
This strategy dumbs gameplay completely down.
Worst of all I can't pick anything else if I don't want to get my ass kicked.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Chess, 04.02.2019 at 17:16
That strategy feels terrible to play with. Essentially, i am just dragging militia around. I don't need to worry about income. Just take the next capital because I will get more cancerous units to expand with.
With the transports nerfed I can't even properly chain units. Every move becomes predictable.
This strategy dumbs gameplay completely down.
Worst of all I can't pick anything else if I don't want to get my ass kicked.
I think it has a similar concept to RA because all you do with RA is drag tanks around but maybe militia with 6 attack is super op me thinks.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
It's cool that you are actually implementing these strats for these testing phases, as for this strategy I think it does remove all tactical thinking. Chess summed it up perfectly.
----
Lest we forget
Moja Bosna Ponosna
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Actually, if you gave INSURRECTION militias's an extra doze of stealth, would make a good deal of a difference.. other than buffed stats and weaken all the others.. I maybe wrong, but I mean, most of those insurrectionists you see do pop up out of nowhere right?
----
A little rusty but I think I can still put up a bit of a fight
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Erm the strat is still op. slaughtered my gc ukr and ins vs ins is the most cancerous game i have ever seen.....
take it away or make some drastic changes....
4/5 only viable option in my opinion
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut JF., 04.02.2019 at 22:39
Erm the strat is still op. slaughtered my gc ukr and ins vs ins is the most cancerous game i have ever seen.....
take it away or make some drastic changes....
4/5 only viable option in my opinion
4/5 still seems really op for some games
I'd pay 40 cost for 4/4 units tbh
4/5 still feels too strong
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut LukeTan, 04.02.2019 at 23:08
Kirjoittanut JF., 04.02.2019 at 22:39
Erm the strat is still op. slaughtered my gc ukr and ins vs ins is the most cancerous game i have ever seen.....
take it away or make some drastic changes....
4/5 only viable option in my opinion
4/5 still seems really op for some games
I'd pay 40 cost for 4/4 units tbh
4/5 still feels too strong
4/4 its useless
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
AT LAST WE HAV ONE
----
http://prntscr.com/omka79
http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv
Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est
Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
I support this strategy and you should ignore people complaining is the hour of insurrection
----
http://prntscr.com/omka79
http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv
Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est
Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Awesome! can't wait to try everything out!
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
At first glance this looks like quite an uneven strategy. Most people will be spamming just militia when they use this strategy. Usually most strategies nerf some units and boost others. This one feels like half baked version of gw. If the point of this strategy is for low income countries gw already accomplished that.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Could you also clean up the units and strategies page, remove strats and units not in use.
Ok, after trying it for few games I would say this is bad strategy. The strategy basically involves spamming militia. Hell militia has same attack strength as tanks. Since this is a one unit strategy I would suggest increase the price of militia by 10 and reduce range by 1. Otherwise this is way over powered.
One strategy similar to this is GW. But even GW didn't have this way over powered militia. Gw is essentially a stealth strategy that means to beat gw you need to attack its marines (weaker defense). Also in gw militia don't have the range same as insurrection. Here you have a single unit that is good for both attack and defense.
Imagine playing turkey 3 v 3 with this strategy.....
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
The range of mil is just too OP. Played 1v1 germ ins vs uk pd, when germ starts taking over birm, 8 free militia! GG.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Here's a thought for consideration!
Boost Iron Fist:
+1 mvmt mil
Boost Relentless Attack
+1 att tanks (or maybe +1 health?)
-1 att infantry
-1 def militia (open to discussion on this)
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut ise-kun, 09.02.2019 at 14:25
Here's a thought for consideration!
Boost Iron Fist:
+1 mvmt mil
Boost Relentless Attack
+1 att tanks (or maybe +1 health?)
-1 att infantry
-1 def militia (open to discussion on this)
Buff if nice joke dont make it more op
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
This new strategy is pretty uneven. It's impossible to win against it on default Europe or Europe+ map, for example.
At least give and option to disable specific strategy on game making.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Froyer, 10.02.2019 at 04:28
Kirjoittanut ise-kun, 09.02.2019 at 14:25
Here's a thought for consideration!
Boost Iron Fist:
+1 mvmt mil
Boost Relentless Attack
+1 att tanks (or maybe +1 health?)
-1 att infantry
-1 def militia (open to discussion on this)
Buff if nice joke dont make it more op
which?
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Okay, Insurrection has just been nerfed again. -1 range and -1 defense for militia. Let's see how that goes...
----
| All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer,
but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved.
--Sun Tzu
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Good news
----
''People ask for criticism, but they only want praise.''
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Dave, 11.02.2019 at 13:18
Okay, Insurrection has just been nerfed again. -1 range and -1 defense for militia. Let's see how that goes...
Thank you for the fast reply!
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Dave, 11.02.2019 at 13:18
Okay, Insurrection has just been nerfed again. -1 range and -1 defense for militia. Let's see how that goes...
Now its just a worse gw.4 def mil imao D Also people crying about spamming militia is funny since at least half countries in 3v3s spam pd infantry DDDD
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Okay tried it in a game. It's still very strong, but not as crazy as it used to be. I think it needs a -1/-2def for infantry and then it should be in a state where it's not OP.
It definitely has it's weaknesses now.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Could be a good strategy for a zombie faction in a zombie mod. low range and can snowball.
----
Hi
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Nations, 12.02.2019 at 12:46
Kirjoittanut Dave, 11.02.2019 at 13:18
Okay, Insurrection has just been nerfed again. -1 range and -1 defense for militia. Let's see how that goes...
Now its just a worse gw.4 def mil imao D Also people crying about spamming militia is funny since at least half countries in 3v3s spam pd infantry DDDD
Im pretty sure gw doesnt get a 40
cost 6 attack unit.
Here's a protip, you can still use infantry to defend with insurrection.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Nations, 12.02.2019 at 12:46
Kirjoittanut Dave, 11.02.2019 at 13:18
Okay, Insurrection has just been nerfed again. -1 range and -1 defense for militia. Let's see how that goes...
Now its just a worse gw.4 def mil imao D Also people crying about spamming militia is funny since at least half countries in 3v3s spam pd infantry DDDD
Im pretty sure gw doesnt get a 40
cost 6 attack unit.
Here's a protip, you can still use infantry to defend with insurrection.
Indeed but spamming infantry lowers your spam for 1att units...
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
FYI it's now March 6 and the Insurrection strategy has ended. Hope you enjoyed it!
Just a reminder that our Counter-Insurgency strategy is still available for a couple more weeks.
----
| All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer,
but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved.
--Sun Tzu
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Dave, 06.03.2019 at 21:19
FYI it's now March 6 and the Insurrection strategy has ended. Hope you enjoyed it!
Just a reminder that our Counter-Insurgency strategy is still available for a couple more weeks.
Hope it comes back eventually!
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Kirjoittanut Dave, 06.03.2019 at 21:19
FYI it's now March 6 and the Insurrection strategy has ended. Hope you enjoyed it!
Just a reminder that our Counter-Insurgency strategy is still available for a couple more weeks.
Luckily I tried this strategy once for the first and last time yesterday
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|