02.07.2015 - 21:48
I think a person should be able to produce troops in an allies territory from cities they own in that territory. This way, it gives more flexibility and coordination between allies. A more in-depth explanation: Suppose I own France, by capturing it's capital. After capturing all the other cities in France, I leave one or more of the cities empty so my ally can have it. With this new addition, the city my ally took would be able to get all the reinforcements and income of that city without having the capital of it (In this case, Paris), and would also allow the owner of the capital to still get the whole country bonus. Often times, allies each attack separate territories, knowing that whoever gets the cap gets all the money and reinforcements (leaving the other one with nothing). In this addition, allies can split up the cities of a particular territory, knowing the whole country bonus would still be there, and also that they would get the reinforcements of the cities they own individually as well. Share your opinions!
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
03.07.2015 - 10:51
Also income from any shared territory/city should be the same as if allies were as 1 in my opinion. Support.
---- intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
03.07.2015 - 11:53
And, the original owner would still get the whole country bonus, but not necessarily have the income of that particular city that the ally owns.
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
04.07.2015 - 10:10
While we're at it, we should be able to control the troops of all of our ten allies and buttrape the others idiots too newb to allyfag. Then we should have an option to make neutral countries ally and implement an AI system where we can control the troops of neutral countries and share their income.
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
04.07.2015 - 11:25
if a city have 5 reins. will both of you have a max of 10 reins combine or is it shared?
---- Hi
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
04.07.2015 - 14:01
No, I'll try to explain it a bit clearer here: Suppose I own France, by capturing it's capital. After capturing all the other cities in France, I leave one or more of the cities empty so my ally can have it. With this new addition, the city my ally took would be able to get all the reinforcements and income of that city without having the capital of it (In this case, Paris), and would also allow the owner of the capital to still get the whole country bonus. Often times, allies each attack separate territories, knowing that whoever gets the cap gets all the money and reinforcements (leaving the other one with nothing). In this addition, allies can split up the cities of a particular territory, knowing the whole country bonus would still be there, and also that they would get the reinforcements of the cities they own individually as well. An extended version of this could include joint defense of a territory/city (possible joint ownerhip as well, but it gets more complicated there), and will shed more light of my ideas on that part if this 1st part gets implemented.
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
04.07.2015 - 14:04
Gets quite a bit complicated in that direction. Be best to implement the stated ideas, then consider that later. Would also need it's own topic to be fully recognized, as this topic is specifically focusing on allied ownership of cities/territories.
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
|
04.07.2015 - 17:24
Report it to a mod privately; not publicly, and not here
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
|
Oletko varma?