Hanki Premium piilottaaksesi kaikki mainokset
Postit: 12   Viereailijat: 58 users
24.01.2016 - 15:50
Well,i was thinking to give some idea like this(because of situations in Middle East XD)
So,maybe you will think that this strategy is like GW,but please stay and read.
So,idea is to give all units low defence,and not that big attack,but cheap units.
Militia:
4 Attack (+1)
5 Defence (+1)
5 Range (+3)
20 Cost (-10)
As you see,militia is buffed.
Infantry:
4 Attack (same)
4 Defence (-2)
5 Range (-1)
30 Cost (-40)
Tanks:
6 Attack (-2)
3 Defence (-1)
5 Range (-2)
70 Cost (-50)
Marines
5 Attack (-3)
1 Defence (-2)
6 Range (same)
50 Cost (-110!!!)
Bombers
3 Attack (-3)
3 Defence (-3)
6 Range (same)
Destroyer
6 Attack (-3)
4 Defence (-3)
Stealth
All same
Submarine
All same
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
24.01.2016 - 20:43
We call it hybrid Warfare
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
24.01.2016 - 21:44
I was about to say the same thing n hybrid warfare was useless. i tried using it on 50k world map china but no bad idea it was
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 04:30
For those above this is nothing like hybrid warfare.

I think this strat idea might have some legs, punish range and defence and increase attack and lower cost is a nice concept. Militia should probably remain the same as other strats and have a buff on defence to make it the primary defense unit.

I don't like the name- copying cthulhus idea.
And the price drops are too high, marines should not be included in the price drop to avoid similarity with GW and when the hell do mid east countries have stealth troops?

But overall, nice concept
----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 08:18
Too many changes
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 08:31
Kirjoittanut Phoenix, 25.01.2016 at 04:30

For those above this is nothing like hybrid warfare.

I think this strat idea might have some legs, punish range and defence and increase attack and lower cost is a nice concept. Militia should probably remain the same as other strats and have a buff on defence to make it the primary defense unit.

I don't like the name- copying cthulhus idea.
And the price drops are too high, marines should not be included in the price drop to avoid similarity with GW and when the hell do mid east countries have stealth troops?

But overall, nice concept

isis has stealths DDDD ok will change name to isis warfare xd

Kirjoittanut Xenosapien, 25.01.2016 at 08:18

Too many changes

ik peeps like you who only like to play pd.
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 09:31
>xeno
>only plays pd

ok.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 09:36
 Evic
Seems underpowered, no real attack units, and they all slow as fuck + infs useless, like utterly useless
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 10:08
Its funny hiw u give infantry defence-2 and same attack and for tanks -2 att and -1 defence.

So basically youre nerfing defence of defensive units and attack of attacking units.

Please stop posting on forums, i dont want your retardness to spread more
----

Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 10:41
Kirjoittanut Kromn, 25.01.2016 at 08:31

ik peeps like you who only like to play pd.




well done.

----
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
25.01.2016 - 18:08
Kirjoittanut Permamuted, 25.01.2016 at 10:41

Kirjoittanut Kromn, 25.01.2016 at 08:31

ik peeps like you who only like to play pd.




well done.



hhaahahaha
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
26.01.2016 - 04:59
Kirjoittanut The Tactician, 25.01.2016 at 09:31

>xeno
>only plays pd

ok.


sm fag for life
Ladataan...
Ladataan...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Yksityisyys | Käyttöehdot | Bannerit | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Liity meihin:

Levitä sanaa