Delete/reduce outdated threads

I check most topics but a lot are a waste of viewing
(exept maybe for those who contribute).
so much repition going nowhere,
Y other than egos does nobody clear/clean them ?
i may also be guilty but try to keep all short,sweet,salient.

Kirjoittanut Qu1et, 29.08.2018 at 03:23

I check most topics but a lot are a waste of viewing
(exept maybe for those who contribute).
so much repition going nowhere,
Y other than egos does nobody clear/clean them ?
i may also be guilty but try to keep all short,sweet,salient.

This has been a topic of discussion in the past. Game creators (Amok and Ivan) both have indicated to keep posts and threads unless they are in clear violation. There are moderators willing to 'clean up' the waste, but this has not been supported by admin, most mods and many players, as it can be subjective and therefor create problems.

You are correct that many topics are a waste... however, generally mods try to keep 'off-topic' threads in the off-topic, so if you are looking for 'substance' you can at least ignore these threads. ♥

I've seen many topics like that already, so much repetition going nowhere, i suggest to delete it

Oh the irony of indolent procrastination ;-)
so K. =

Those are part of AWs history

& ?
so why not have a History Topic ?
maybe any off/outdated/personal threads over 4 months old could be auto-relocated.
anyone interested/reminiscing or verifying can do so all in 1 place.
then looking for useful or & New info wouldn't take pointless ages to find.

Go back to your pond fish. dont touch aw history.

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 30.08.2018 at 11:21

Go back to your pond fish. dont touch aw history.

Try reading all prior to "spouting" off.

"No"

You missed the pun ?

Idea not to destroy but to consolidate all in 1 place !
any1 being so vehement about this actually read up to 67 pages of historical aw ?
huge amounts of which seemingly are "quote-quote-quote-quo you get the picture.
this is not flame war its about the salient(before posting indignant retort do read 1st sentence thanks)

I do