[ewe's histories] Autorities and trustworty.

The relationship between the autorities and critizens always tends to be controversial. At the end of the history, a question will be made.


"One day I was going to meet my Mother on his work. Traveling from whole López de Vega avenue, right in the John F Kennedy avenue is a task that I am not pretty used to, so while I was walking I've took a time for see the impressive U.S people builts: Markets, BIG skycrapers, squares... I did ever visit Novo Centro square. It was impressed, but the amounts of cameras that were spying for any scrap of récord was as impressive as well. They do take Security serious.

But after I went to my mother's job, I rather saw a warn place. Maybe too much freedom? I've decide then, and asked her what does she thinks about the Trustworty in the job.

"On my conferencial tasks, I've had the oportunity to ask an expert once. Trusting your own employeers is for sure important." she replied.

"But think about this. There are two towns, in one town the Police trust the critizens, in other they does not.

In the one they does trust, there are lot of criminal actions. Most of the guys that should've punished are free, Because they are innocent in the eyes of the autorities. On the other hand, in the town where they does not, the critizens constantly claims for the Police being unfair on their actions. There is almost no criminal cases, and this type of environment ends up by killing own critizens trustworty.

Which one would you choose? I guess we all want one that is good with us, but bad with the rest. But if you had to choose between those two, which one would you rather choose? Do you believe that we as humans will be able to do the right stuff if someones trust on us? Or rather, that we need to be self-regulated by an autority, in this case, ourselves?"

"That sounds very hypothetical" she replied. Sounds like certain SM friend that always discard my arguments by this reason...

"I might be..." and end up the converzation.

---

Here comes the loaded question: In AtWar, we also have an autority. Which type of moderator would you rather choose? Which type do you think we currently have?

Moderator A: Is friendly with everybody. He barely mute/warn anyone, and he express his opinión openly.

Moderator B: He is only friendly with his friends. He share moderator knowledge with them, and never enforce the rules on them. He's unlikely to warn/mute anyone, except his enemies.

Moderator C: He likes to enforce the rules. He mutes and ban for fun, but he still owns a little bias when dealing with friends actions.

Moderator D: He strictly follows the rules. He mutes and Ban anyone he consider a rule breaker. He also holds his own definition of the rules.

In other words, Clovis had a conversation with his mom, and he decides to share the topic of conversation here.
gg

Moderator D.

Since there is a set of rules posted in the AtWar forums, I demand that they be rigorously and fairly applied.

Moderator A better

A/D. A stable mix of both

C, one should always enjoy his job

Tunder3 and Google Chrome's A, I can understand.

Why the heck would anyone pick C?

Acqui.
i mean A.

Kirjoittanut Tundy, 15.03.2015 at 21:55

In other words, Clovis had a conversation with his mom, and he decides to share the topic of conversation here.
gg

lold hard

Kirjoittanut Khal.eesi, 16.03.2015 at 00:21

Acqui.
i mean A.

Kirjoittanut Tundy, 15.03.2015 at 21:55

In other words, Clovis had a conversation with his mom, and he decides to share the topic of conversation here.
gg

It was interesting, either way I don't See why you need to go off topic.

Returning to the question, ¿Do you think there should be confidence in the Jobs?

Vril best!

Clearly B

Option 'E' : Self-moderation:

Ideally, we self-moderate. We conduct ourselves consistent with the non-interference principle.
If we violate this by interfering with someone else, we chomp down hard on the cyanide pill in the back of our mouth.

Kirjoittanut International, 15.03.2015 at 22:31

Tunder3 and Google Chrome's A, I can understand.

Why the heck would anyone pick C?

cause i would be that kind of mod, and i enjoy when the people is muted and, as i said, we should always enjoy our work

Kirjoittanut brianwl, 16.03.2015 at 15:02

Option 'E' : Self-moderation:

Ideally, we self-moderate. We conduct ourselves consistent with the non-interference principle.
If we violate this by interfering with someone else, we chomp down hard on the cyanide pill in the back of our mouth.

My dream is to be with her... But her dream is to be with him... How to not avoid interfering!

Kirjoittanut clovis1122, 16.03.2015 at 17:26

Kirjoittanut brianwl, 16.03.2015 at 15:02

Option 'E' : Self-moderation:

Ideally, we self-moderate. We conduct ourselves consistent with the non-interference principle.
If we violate this by interfering with someone else, we chomp down hard on the cyanide pill in the back of our mouth.

My dream is to be with her... But her dream is to be with him... How to not avoid interfering!

haha, this is tough .... true temptation... but it helps to realize it is dream...

reality is , even the best relationships more often than not end up in divorce court and your 'dream' turns to nightmare...

so , just hang out at local divorce court and watch the misery, and feel good it wasn't you, and the poor bastard she's with now will have his dignity destroyed in time. This should cure your temptation temporarily at least.