Croat trolling our game

So a mod in this case croat just changed the rules of our game in favor of one team..

https://prnt.sc/urhy5n

Https://prnt.sc/urhzx8
https://prnt.sc/uri2f7

game wasnt majority and we as entente did not accept rule changes.
Since croat abused his powers and ruined this game.

idk not the first time mods abuse their power

Game was majority and there was 5 CP players left compared to 3 Entente players...Settings was bugged usual and even tho we had a 5-3 vote advantage rules didnt change. It was fair

Yea, I have changed the rules of WWI because certain people pleased me to do it, since there was a bug with majority changing settings.
I came and asked if majority agrees on changes to 1 min turns, and majority agreed.
Then I went to change it, because it was impossible to them, due to bug, to change it even the game changing settings were set up to 'majority'
( https://prnt.sc/urhym8 ).
Also, you had like 3x less SP count then the rest (795:2340), but that's not an argument, just a mention. ( https://prnt.sc/urhzv7 )

I am probably the only Mod that includes himself into crap happening in scenarios with settings, toxicity in chats there or similiar, even I don't understand that part of game, but most of people were thankful for that. Same I did this time. Listened to majority, my logic and what I see with my eyes.
If you feel harmed by my intention to help (not any kind of power abusing as you say zz), then I won't include myself into any kind of game settings, winning conditions and similiar game changes from now on.

Kirjoittanut Zeus..., 01.10.2020 at 15:38

Game was majority and there was 5 CP players left compared to 3 Entente players...Settings was bugged usual and even tho we had a 5-3 vote advantage rules didnt change. It was fair

Game was 1 minute when croat changed rules. You can see the screenshot.
U just asked croat, and he changed the rules in your favor.

And a mod in my opinion should not change any rules if there is no consensus about it. Since there wasnt, and he didnt even ask it on the game chat. He ruled a game of 33+ turns. Which is 33 x 5 = 165 minutes not including waiting time.

Kirjoittanut Croat, 01.10.2020 at 15:40

Yea, I have changed the rules of WWI because certain people pleased me to do it, since there was a bug with majority changing settings.
I came and asked if majority agrees on changes to 1 min turns, and majority agreed.
Then I went to change it, because it was impossible to them, due to bug, to change it even the game changing settings were set up to 'majority'
( https://prnt.sc/urhym8 ).
Also, you had like 3x less SP count then the rest (795:2340), but that's not an argument, just a mention. ( https://prnt.sc/urhzv7 )

I am probably the only Mod that includes himself into crap happening in scenarios with settings, toxicity in chats there or similiar, even I don't understand that part of game, but most of people were thankful for that. Same I did this time. Listened to majority, my logic and what I see with my eyes.
If you feel harmed by my intention to help, then I won't include myself into any kind of game settings, winning conditions and similiar game changes from now on.

You definitely should lol. It's pretty annoying, especially in scenarios when a certain person refuses to leave, and you have to play for hours to get them out of the game.

Kirjoittanut ITSGG1122, 01.10.2020 at 15:41

and he didnt even ask it on the game chat.

Huh?

Kirjoittanut Croat, 01.10.2020 at 15:40

Yea, I have changed the rules of WWI because certain people pleased me to do it, since there was a bug with majority changing settings.
I came and asked if majority agrees on changes to 1 min turns, and majority agreed.
Then I went to change it, because it was impossible to them, due to bug, to change it even the game changing settings were set up to 'majority'
( https://prnt.sc/urhym8 ).
Also, you had like 3x less SP count then the rest (795:2340), but that's not an argument, just a mention. ( https://prnt.sc/urhzv7 )

I am probably the only Mod that includes himself into crap happening in scenarios with settings, toxicity in chats there or similiar, even I don't understand that part of game, but most of people were thankful for that. Same I did this time. Listened to majority, my logic and what I see with my eyes.
If you feel harmed by my intention to help (not any kind of power abusing as you say zz), then I won't include myself into any kind of game settings, winning conditions and similiar game changes from now on.

Its a team game and the main players of entente were still here. I dont recall any entente players agreeing to changing the rules in favor of the enemy.
If there was only 1 player left of one team who was clearly trolling the game then yes. But in this case the game was still going evenly. By changing the rules you favored one team and made them win the game instantly and ruined 33 turns of 5 minutes of play.

Maybe it would be best if you asked both teams of a scenario game instead of applying it instantly.
And clearly you have no idea how this game works. 800 sp vs 2300sp is not in their favor. The game can usually be decided on t45-t50 when one or more of the other team dies. Play a few scenario maps before talking about it.

Kirjoittanut Croat, 01.10.2020 at 15:48

Kirjoittanut ITSGG1122, 01.10.2020 at 15:41

and he didnt even ask it on the game chat.

Huh?

I had you on mute so i didnt see it and nobody said anything in the chat about you changing it. Thought a spectator's chat would always be visible but in this case it wasnt.

Kirjoittanut ITSGG1122, 01.10.2020 at 15:48

Kirjoittanut Croat, 01.10.2020 at 15:40

Yea, I have changed the rules of WWI because certain people pleased me to do it, since there was a bug with majority changing settings.
I came and asked if majority agrees on changes to 1 min turns, and majority agreed.
Then I went to change it, because it was impossible to them, due to bug, to change it even the game changing settings were set up to 'majority'
( https://prnt.sc/urhym8 ).
Also, you had like 3x less SP count then the rest (795:2340), but that's not an argument, just a mention. ( https://prnt.sc/urhzv7 )

I am probably the only Mod that includes himself into crap happening in scenarios with settings, toxicity in chats there or similiar, even I don't understand that part of game, but most of people were thankful for that. Same I did this time. Listened to majority, my logic and what I see with my eyes.
If you feel harmed by my intention to help (not any kind of power abusing as you say zz), then I won't include myself into any kind of game settings, winning conditions and similiar game changes from now on.

Its a team game and the main players of entente were still here. I dont recall any entente players agreeing to changing the rules in favor of the enemy.
If there was only 1 player left of one team who was clearly trolling the game then yes. But in this case the game was still going evenly. By changing the rules you favored one team and made them win the game instantly and ruined 33 turns of 5 minutes of play.

Maybe it would be best if you asked both teams of a scenario game instead of applying it instantly.
And clearly you have no idea how this game works. 800 sp vs 2300sp is not in their favor. The game can usually be decided on t45-t50 when one or more of the other team dies. Play a few scenario maps before talking about it.

Game going evenly? Ottoman had full iraq and saudi arabia, Russia was dead and West Germany had his trade walled and had full country bonus in North germany, Austria had 600 units in his trench and I had 150, while you and France both had together 400. There was no way you guys were gonna win.

Also i dont see any of entente players saying anything to it let alone agreeing. https://prnt.sc/urid74 https://prnt.sc/uridxj

Regardless, i think the only thing that matters here is that the settings from the start were majority change and CP had 5 players while Entente had 3, doesnt matter which nations the players were. We should have been able to change it without any mod help and it would have been within our rights according the rules lmao. But the settings was bugged and even our 5-3 vote majority didnt go through which is why we needed a mod help. It aint that deep

Kirjoittanut Karlo18, 01.10.2020 at 15:51

Kirjoittanut ITSGG1122, 01.10.2020 at 15:48

Kirjoittanut Croat, 01.10.2020 at 15:40

Yea, I have changed the rules of WWI because certain people pleased me to do it, since there was a bug with majority changing settings.
I came and asked if majority agrees on changes to 1 min turns, and majority agreed.
Then I went to change it, because it was impossible to them, due to bug, to change it even the game changing settings were set up to 'majority'
( https://prnt.sc/urhym8 ).
Also, you had like 3x less SP count then the rest (795:2340), but that's not an argument, just a mention. ( https://prnt.sc/urhzv7 )

I am probably the only Mod that includes himself into crap happening in scenarios with settings, toxicity in chats there or similiar, even I don't understand that part of game, but most of people were thankful for that. Same I did this time. Listened to majority, my logic and what I see with my eyes.
If you feel harmed by my intention to help (not any kind of power abusing as you say zz), then I won't include myself into any kind of game settings, winning conditions and similiar game changes from now on.

Its a team game and the main players of entente were still here. I dont recall any entente players agreeing to changing the rules in favor of the enemy.
If there was only 1 player left of one team who was clearly trolling the game then yes. But in this case the game was still going evenly. By changing the rules you favored one team and made them win the game instantly and ruined 33 turns of 5 minutes of play.

Maybe it would be best if you asked both teams of a scenario game instead of applying it instantly.
And clearly you have no idea how this game works. 800 sp vs 2300sp is not in their favor. The game can usually be decided on t45-t50 when one or more of the other team dies. Play a few scenario maps before talking about it.

Game going evenly? Ottoman had full iraq and saudi arabia, Russia was dead and West Germany had his trade walled and had full country bonus in North germany, Austria had 600 units in his trench and I had 150, while you and France both had together 400. There was no way you guys were gonna win.

I killed like 500 of your units losing only 150~~

Yes we had a chance. All your and western german units (cons mainly) were fodder units.
Not even talking about the late game disadvantage events to your team but kk

I was Prussia noob, I was spamming full Krup arts at one point I even had 13k in the bank, not to mention 1600 stack from West Germany

Doesn't matter anymore.

I realized such kind of my involvment into games can cause troubles (even they were pretty logical and reasonable) and to stop such happenings in future, from now on you won't be able to count on myself about game settings or victory condition changes.
Thanks on understanding and I'm sorry if you feel harmed, Gigi, I just think I did a logical move from my perspective.

I will add x2 SP to the losing side (Gigi, Cimpro and TheItalianMafia) if that can make things softer, so, basically, you're all the winners. I hope that's fair solution.
Nothing more I can do besides my decision written above.

Will lock to stop potential flames over here.