Were the jews behind communism?

Pics related to the topic title

The Germans did not send only Lenin to Russia, but other proeminent communist leaders as Trotsky with the explicit purpose to destabilise the Eastern front using indirectly these guys (and they succeded, after Bolsheviks took over Brest-Litovsk was signed) Idk if those Germans were Jewish, maybe they were Waloons so maybe Waloons are responsible for communism. (I am joking) Better do a minimum research about democrat Kerensky's weakness and incapability to stifle the Bolshevik uprising as well as his firm no to using force against them on the streets of Petrograd and Moscow.
Research more please and stop underlining with red Jews, because is pathetic and you may be acused of anti-semitism, History Channel and Wikipedia are as reliable as a man from the street telling you that Le Bron James is in fact white, you can use them for starters, but nothing more.

All the best

Your list is hilariously inaccurate. While many of the leaders of the German revolution were Jewish, just as many were non-Jewish. I'm not even going to talk about your first point because it's so hilariously far-fetched. Jews were simply often in the inner circle of the Communist party because they had the economic strength to back the revolution while they also weren't brainwashed by the monarchy's nationalist propaganda. They were also sick of the war since of all ethnic groups in Germany Jews had the highest percentage of people fighting in the war (I bet you didn't know that) while many Jewish buisnessmen and bankers supported the German war effort. I bet you also didn't know that the German military in WW1 believed Jews to be unpatriotic and even devised a system to prove it, except the system didn't prove it, it actually disproved it and showed how Jews were bravely fighting for Germany in the war. But of course the German government didn't release that, it released fake results that suited their fancy. After serving the country better than anyone for 4 years and 12,000 Jews dying in the battlefield, the only thing the Jews got in return was the stab-in-the-back myth, that accused them for everything, since obviously everyone needs a scapegoat. Also, how did the Jews "exploit" Germany, when their fucking revolution didn't even succeed? The 1918 revolution failed, it failed and failed hard, these "Jews" couldn't exploit anything even if they wanted it. Quite frankly, I'd love if people's minds weren't still stuck on 19th-century mindbases, fighting in a nationalistic dick measuring contest and trying to put the blame on everyone else.

((((They))) are behind everything.

Kirjoittanut Zephyrusu, 18.03.2017 at 04:22

brainwashed by the monarchy's nationalist propaganda

This is false, because 50% of European people were illiterate and mass media was not developed in that time, so it was actually vice-versa, where monarchies had to obey the masses - concerning conservative and liberal policies.

Monarchies could not propagandize nationalism when 95% of population was conservative right wing nationalist. That is, irrationally redundant i guess.

Of course Jews were behind Communism, just look at China and Cambodia, Pol Pot was a circumized jew and Mao was expert in tanakh.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 18.03.2017 at 11:42

Of course Jews were behind Communism, just look at China and Cambodia, Pol Pot was a circumized jew and Mao was expert in tanakh.

irrelevant facts, those brought communism to asia some 30-40 years later, they werent the ones who introduced it to europe

Kirjoittanut Skittzophrenic, 18.03.2017 at 09:46

((((They))) are behind everything.

Kirjoittanut Zephyrusu, 18.03.2017 at 04:22

-snip-

Well said! Couldn't have put it better myself.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sometimes, there is genuine cause behind identity politics, but in most cases, including this, it's fuelled by angry people trying to find somebody other then themselves to blame for whatever ill luck happens to fall upon them.

The economic ghetto that medieval and early modern Europe forced Jews into ended up making Jews heavily present in financial institutions, which just coincidentally happened to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Industrial Revolution and the subsequent development of liberal capitalism. As a natural result disproportionate numbers of Jews landed in leading positions in European society, which is why they show up so often in historical events like the Bolshevik revolution.

I can't say that there is no conspiracy. But what I can definitely say is that there is no reason to believe in a conspiracy.

Necropost

Leon Trotsky was a jew

Oh look its the same old tiring apologetic bullshit, painting Jous as the victims of opression and coincidence. Yeah Jous just happened to be behind every single revolution in Germany, Hungary, Russia and then the rest of Europe. Its not like they are behind every single world war, funding both sides. And yeah Jous dindu nuffin in Germany, its not like they infiltrated the banking, judiciary and media sector in the country and tried to take over pushing for their own interests that were directly opposed to those of national Germans.

Yeah lets all keep our mouth shut and rewrite history.

Jous? Victims!
Muslims? Peace!
Blacks? Reperations!
Christian/atheist European male? Hitler!


Signed
a nazi transgender

Dont forget your pills khal!

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 18.03.2017 at 11:42

Of course Jews were behind Communism, just look at China and Cambodia, Pol Pot was a circumized jew and Mao was expert in tanakh.

Maoism isn't quite the same as russian communism.......

Your logic is genius if only....Israel was a communist country.
But wait its not hmmmm how could that be
Oy vey darn jews lets blame cancer on them instead...

Btw it makes sense that jews were in power on all sides of the war there are alot of smart and powerfull people who happen to be of jewish origins
The only problem is that Judaism is a religion not a race if you dont practice or dont belive in the jewish religion logic says your not jewish
Just like you wouldnt call a guy born to a Christian family who is an Athiest ,Christian.
Logic much?

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 13.06.2017 at 08:07

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 18.03.2017 at 11:42

Of course Jews were behind Communism, just look at China and Cambodia, Pol Pot was a circumized jew and Mao was expert in tanakh.

Maoism isn't quite the same as russian communism.......

Hmm, kind of oxymoron there. How it can be 'russian communism' when it was against russian values, like religion, language and identity? Russian anti-Russian? I don't think that's possible.

As i understood from Marx, communism is international ideology, which cannot be bounded to nation or one country.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 24.06.2017 at 07:28

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 13.06.2017 at 08:07

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 18.03.2017 at 11:42

Of course Jews were behind Communism, just look at China and Cambodia, Pol Pot was a circumized jew and Mao was expert in tanakh.

Maoism isn't quite the same as russian communism.......

Hmm, kind of oxymoron there. How it can be 'russian communism' when it was against russian values, like religion, language and identity? Russian anti-Russian? I don't think that's possible.

As i understood from Marx, communism is international ideology, which cannot be bounded to nation or one country.

Marxism believed the revolution would be done by the proletariat. In China there weren't almost no proletariat, hence Maoism who based itself on making the revolution with the peasantry..

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 24.06.2017 at 13:53

Marxism believed the revolution would be done by the proletariat. In China there weren't almost no proletariat, hence Maoism who based itself on making the revolution with the peasantry..

Yep, stupid Mao. Marx clearly stated that communism can only be built on capitalism, not feudalism. Lenin had a fierce argue with Martov about that(bolsheviks vs mensheviks/ majority vs minority in the party). Even Trotsky sided with Martov who said that Russia must be let to go through capitalism in the 20th century and when it develops it, then start a revolution and build communism. Lenin wanted instant revolution and build communism in Russia which just abolished feudalism and entered capitalism. But even Lenin realized, when he won, that capitalism is necessary, so he created New Economic Plan(NEP), where he said the party will keep the political power, while people will run the free market economy. Then he died and Stalin started planned economy which resulted in massive industrialization.

And then comes Mao, and start a revolution in China which doesn't even have a proletariat. Very smart indeed.


That's why i like Deng Xiaoping, he switched back to free market (soviet NEP) but kept the party. Instead one big North Korea, he created a superpower.

Kirjoittanut Skanderbeg, 24.06.2017 at 18:32

Kirjoittanut Al Fappino, 24.06.2017 at 13:53

Marxism believed the revolution would be done by the proletariat. In China there weren't almost no proletariat, hence Maoism who based itself on making the revolution with the peasantry..

Yep, stupid Mao. Marx clearly stated that communism can only be built on capitalism, not feudalism. Lenin had a fierce argue with Martov about that(bolsheviks vs mensheviks/ majority vs minority in the party). Even Trotsky sided with Martov who said that Russia must be let to go through capitalism in the 20th century and when it develops it, then start a revolution and build communism. Lenin wanted instant revolution and build communism in Russia which just abolished feudalism and entered capitalism. But even Lenin realized, when he won, that capitalism is necessary, so he created New Economic Plan(NEP), where he said the party will keep the political power, while people will run the free market economy. Then he died and Stalin started planned economy which resulted in massive industrialization.

And then comes Mao, and start a revolution in China which doesn't even have a proletariat. Very smart indeed.


That's why i like Deng Xiaoping, he switched back to free market (soviet NEP) but kept the party. Instead one big North Korea, he created a superpower.

With that, I fully agree. I studied Russia from 1917 to Brejnev era and everytime they furthered communistic policies, they went backwards and liberalized the economy xd