Why is imperialist so weak?

I was playing imp Turk the other day and my opponent was using desert storm Ukraine. He rushed my balkans and I lost my general in Romania and took only rc. I tried destroying his stack but he first moved Romania and late moved my full reinf Greece. I then full rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 15 infantry and I lost.

Imperialist is so weak can we buff it? Please up vote me and we make imperialist good!

My suggestion is a buff on the attack by making it +1 instead of -1.

You rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 1x infantry. Which is a total of 11 units.

You then complain about imp being weak.. You dont see the problem here? What kind of rush is 11 units lmao..

Imp is hella op with its ability to spam reinforcements, if you srsly gonna ask for +1 attack, it will be become one of the most overpowered and outbalanced strategies and then people will complain about the rest of the strategies and we get this whole fiasco once again.

Imp is perfectly fine as it is now, just dont noob around with it and you'll see its a good strategy.

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 08.07.2017 at 05:10

You rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 1x infantry. Which is a total of 11 units.

You then complain about imp being weak.. You dont see the problem here? What kind of rush is 11 units lmao..

Imp is hella op with its ability to spam reinforcements, if you srsly gonna ask for +1 attack, it will be become one of the most overpowered and outbalanced strategies and then people will complain about the rest of the strategies and we get this whole fiasco once again.

Imp is perfectly fine as it is now, just dont noob around with it and you'll see its a good strategy.

you got completely baited

Kirjoittanut Leo, 08.07.2017 at 05:26

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 08.07.2017 at 05:10

You rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 1x infantry. Which is a total of 11 units.

You then complain about imp being weak.. You dont see the problem here? What kind of rush is 11 units lmao..

Imp is hella op with its ability to spam reinforcements, if you srsly gonna ask for +1 attack, it will be become one of the most overpowered and outbalanced strategies and then people will complain about the rest of the strategies and we get this whole fiasco once again.

Imp is perfectly fine as it is now, just dont noob around with it and you'll see its a good strategy.

you got completely baited

Not rlly, I am calling him out, free pass for me to insult with an actual solid reason. More like a treat for me

No it will ruin 99% of scenerios

Because it's cheap af.
Btw, did I get you right, you rushed rc t1 ?

Next time rush with 15 and its ok

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 08.07.2017 at 05:10

You rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 1x infantry. Which is a total of 11 units.

You then complain about imp being weak.. You dont see the problem here? What kind of rush is 11 units lmao..

Imp is hella op with its ability to spam reinforcements, if you srsly gonna ask for +1 attack, it will be become one of the most overpowered and outbalanced strategies and then people will complain about the rest of the strategies and we get this whole fiasco once again.

Imp is perfectly fine as it is now, just dont noob around with it and you'll see its a good strategy.

please explain how +1 attack would make it op and unbalanced? lol wtf

Kirjoittanut boywind2, 08.07.2017 at 08:51

Kirjoittanut Waffel, 08.07.2017 at 05:10

You rushed Kiev t3 with 10 tanks and 1x infantry. Which is a total of 11 units.

You then complain about imp being weak.. You dont see the problem here? What kind of rush is 11 units lmao..

Imp is hella op with its ability to spam reinforcements, if you srsly gonna ask for +1 attack, it will be become one of the most overpowered and outbalanced strategies and then people will complain about the rest of the strategies and we get this whole fiasco once again.

Imp is perfectly fine as it is now, just dont noob around with it and you'll see its a good strategy.

please explain how +1 attack would make it op and unbalanced? lol wtf

i know you are trolling but for anyone that actuaally has that question its bc then imp would have -30 cost and +1 attack leaving it with no weaknesses or repercussions for choosing it

We should make it +2 attack..

Basically a cheaper none. Chess would cream himself.

Kirjoittanut TheManiac, 08.07.2017 at 14:44

We should make it +2 attack..

good idea captain!

Kirjoittanut boywind2, 08.07.2017 at 20:52

Kirjoittanut TheManiac, 08.07.2017 at 14:44

We should make it +2 attack..

good idea captain!

It's weak because you are a goddamn retard at playing it.